The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostatic artery embolization using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The radiation dose was usually decreased after approximately 10 cases were performed by interventional radiologists. In addition, the use of cone-beam CT (CBCT) reduces the risk of nontargeted embolism[ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiation dose was usually decreased after approximately 10 cases were performed by interventional radiologists. In addition, the use of cone-beam CT (CBCT) reduces the risk of nontargeted embolism[ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBCT has been increasingly adopted and recommended during IR procedures, allowing a precise assessment of complex vascular anatomy in 3D with a single injection of contrast medium in a selectively targeted artery. Its bene ts include high spatial resolution combined with an intra-arterial injection of a smaller volume of contrast compared to CT. Its value during PAE compared to DSA has already been demonstrated [10][11][12][13][14][15]. CBCT provided information that impacted treatment in 46% of PAE patients by allowing identi cation of potential sites of non-target embolization [10].…”
Section: Imaging Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has recently been encouraged to better understand the pelvic vascular anatomy [10][11][12][13][14][15], PAE remains technically challenging, typically resulting in long procedure and uoroscopy times, and high radiation dose due to the need for multiple oblique digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) and magni ed views, with signi cant variability between centers (median DAP ranging from 33.2 to 863.4 Gy•cm2 between individual studies) [16][17][18][19][20][21]. In this context, a re ned technique is crucial for technical and clinical success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBCT has been increasingly adopted and recommended during IR procedures, allowing a precise assessment of complex vascular anatomy in 3D with a single injection of contrast medium in a selectively targeted artery. Its benefits include high spatial resolution combined with an intra-arterial injection of a smaller volume of contrast compared to CT. Its value during PAE compared to preoperative CT and to DSA has already been demonstrated (Bagla et al 2013;Wang et al 2017;Rocha et al 2020;Cadour et al 2020;Bagla and Sterling 2014;Schnapauff et al 2020;Desai et al 2018). Compared to DSA, CBCT provided information that impacted treatment in 46% of PAE patients by allowing identification of potential sites of nontarget embolization (Bagla et al 2013).…”
Section: Intraprocedural Imaging -General Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has recently been encouraged to better understand the pelvic vascular anatomy (Bagla et al 2013;Wang et al 2017;Rocha et al 2020;Cadour et al 2020;Bagla and Sterling 2014;Schnapauff et al 2020), PAE remains technically challenging, typically resulting in long procedure and fluoroscopy times, and high radiation dose due to the need for multiple oblique digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) and magnified views, with significant variability between centers (median DAP ranging from 33.2 to 863.4 Gy•cm2 between individual studies) (Laborda et al 2015;Garzon et al 2016;Andrade et al 2017;Maclean et al 2017;Tanaka et al 2017;Zumstein et al 2020). In this context, a refined technique is crucial for technical and clinical success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%