2019
DOI: 10.1177/0284185119834686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in catheter-dependent patients with large prostatic (BPH) glands (>90 cc): early intervention essential

Abstract: Background Prostate artery embolization (PAE) is safe and effective at improving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Purpose To assess the effectiveness of PAE on allowing successful voiding in patients with obstructive BPH (>90 cc) necessitating a urethral catheter for complete urinary retention. Material and Methods Ten consecutive patients with urethral catheters for obstructing BPH were included in the prospective study. Prostate arteries were embolized (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the findings of previous investigations, 6,1214 our study showed that PAE is an efficacious treatment for LUTS secondary to large prostate volume (>80 mL) in elderly patients (≥80 years of age) who were not suitable candidates for open or endoscopic surgical procedures; notably, we found that this surgical approach had a favorable safety profile. All six of the monitored functional results were significantly improved at 12 months postoperatively in the present study, similar to the results reported by Gao et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with the findings of previous investigations, 6,1214 our study showed that PAE is an efficacious treatment for LUTS secondary to large prostate volume (>80 mL) in elderly patients (≥80 years of age) who were not suitable candidates for open or endoscopic surgical procedures; notably, we found that this surgical approach had a favorable safety profile. All six of the monitored functional results were significantly improved at 12 months postoperatively in the present study, similar to the results reported by Gao et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…PAE was proposed relatively recently and has been the focus of increasing interest in both radiological and urological communities since its first successful use for BPH with acute urinary retention in 2010. 7 Consistent with the findings of previous investigations, 6,[12][13][14] our study showed that PAE is an efficacious treatment for LUTS secondary to large prostate volume (>80 mL) in elderly patients (!80 years of age) who were not suitable candidates for open or endoscopic surgical procedures; notably, we found that this surgical approach had a favorable safety profile. All six of the monitored functional results were significantly improved at 12 months postoperatively in the present study, similar to the results reported by Gao et al 9 Furthermore, Lebdai et al 15 reported a mean reduction in IPSS of 11.9 points at 1 month postoperatively, which persisted at 6 months postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Catheter removal was achieved in 33 (81%) of patients [ 22 ]. In another study, similar results were found, with 80% of catheter-dependent becoming catheter-free 3 months after undergoing PAE [ 23 ]. Comparable results were found in another study showing 33 out of 38 (87%) of catheter-dependent patients capable of being catheter-free after 3 months [ 19 ].…”
Section: Indicationssupporting
confidence: 70%