Prostate specific antigen testing is associated with men’s psychological and physical health and their healthcare utilisation in a nationally representative sample: a cross-sectional study
Abstract:BackgroundProstate cancer incidence has risen considerably in recent years, primarily due to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing in primary care. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between PSA testing and the psychological and physical health, and healthcare utilisation of men in a population where PSA testing is widespread.MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in a population-representative sample of men ≥50 years enrolled in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)… Show more
“…However, we expect that women are unlikely to continue filling prescriptions for medication they no longer take. It is important to consider that statins may be preferentially prescribed for, and taken by, patients who engage in healthier behaviours and have superior health outcomes ( Evans et al , 1995 ; Brookhart et al , 2007 ; Flahavan et al , 2014 ). This is known as healthy-user bias and may cause an overestimation of any beneficial effect of statins ( Glynn et al , 2006 ).…”
Background:Recent meta-analyses suggest that pre-diagnostic statin use is associated with reduced breast cancer-specific mortality. Studies have shown that high breast tumour expression of the statin target (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase) is associated with lymph-node negative cancer. Therefore, we examined the association between pre-diagnostic statin use and; lymph node status, breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality.Methods:Women with stages I–III breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (N=6314). Pre-diagnostic statin users were identified from linked prescription claims data (N=2082). Relative risks were estimated for associations between pre-diagnostic statin use and lymph node status. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for associations between pre-diagnostic statin use and breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality.Results:Pre-diagnostic statin use was not associated with lymph node negative status at diagnosis. In multivariate analyses, pre-diagnostic statin use was associated with reduced all-cause (HR 0.78 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.89) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.81 95% CI 0.68, 0.96). This reduction in cancer-specific mortality was greatest in statin-users with oestrogen (ER) receptor-positive tumours (HR 0.69 95% CI 0.55, 0.85).Conclusion:Patients with pre-diagnostic statin exposure had a significant reduction in breast cancer-specific mortality, which was even more pronounced in women with ER+ tumours.
“…However, we expect that women are unlikely to continue filling prescriptions for medication they no longer take. It is important to consider that statins may be preferentially prescribed for, and taken by, patients who engage in healthier behaviours and have superior health outcomes ( Evans et al , 1995 ; Brookhart et al , 2007 ; Flahavan et al , 2014 ). This is known as healthy-user bias and may cause an overestimation of any beneficial effect of statins ( Glynn et al , 2006 ).…”
Background:Recent meta-analyses suggest that pre-diagnostic statin use is associated with reduced breast cancer-specific mortality. Studies have shown that high breast tumour expression of the statin target (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase) is associated with lymph-node negative cancer. Therefore, we examined the association between pre-diagnostic statin use and; lymph node status, breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality.Methods:Women with stages I–III breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (N=6314). Pre-diagnostic statin users were identified from linked prescription claims data (N=2082). Relative risks were estimated for associations between pre-diagnostic statin use and lymph node status. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for associations between pre-diagnostic statin use and breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality.Results:Pre-diagnostic statin use was not associated with lymph node negative status at diagnosis. In multivariate analyses, pre-diagnostic statin use was associated with reduced all-cause (HR 0.78 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.89) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.81 95% CI 0.68, 0.96). This reduction in cancer-specific mortality was greatest in statin-users with oestrogen (ER) receptor-positive tumours (HR 0.69 95% CI 0.55, 0.85).Conclusion:Patients with pre-diagnostic statin exposure had a significant reduction in breast cancer-specific mortality, which was even more pronounced in women with ER+ tumours.
“…This they hypothesise may be due to (i) adherent patients being ‘more health seeking’ and therefore more likely to seek or agree to take other preventative interventions and tests and/or (ii) differences in health status (physical and cognitive) between the two groups, with those who are adherent being healthier. Additionally, men with poorer psychological health have been found to be less likely to have PSA tests [ 32 – 34 ]. Moreover, those predisposed to poorer psychological health are also predisposed to poor wellbeing throughout their disease trajectory [ 35 ].…”
PurposeMany men with prostate cancer are asymptomatic, diagnosed following prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing. We investigate whether mode of detection, i.e. ‘PSA detected’ or ‘clinically detected’, was associated with psychological wellbeing among prostate cancer survivors.MethodsA cross-sectional postal questionnaire was administered in 2012 to 6559 prostate cancer (ICD10 C61) survivors up to 18 years post-diagnosis, identified through population-based cancer registries in Ireland. Psychological wellbeing was assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21. Logistic regression was used to investigate associations between mode of detection and depression, anxiety and stress, adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical confounders.ResultsThe response rate was 54 % (3348/6262). Fifty-nine percent of survivors were diagnosed with asymptomatic PSA-tested disease. Prevalence of depression (13.8 vs 20.7 %; p < 0.001), anxiety (13.6 vs 20.9 %; p < 0.001) and stress (8.7 vs 13.8 %; p < 0.001) were significantly lower among survivors diagnosed with PSA-detected, than clinically detected disease. After adjusting for clinical and socio-demographic factors, survivors with clinically detected disease had significantly higher risk of depression (odds ratio (OR) = 1.46 95 % CI 1.18, 1.80; p = 0.001), anxiety (OR = 1.36 95 % CI 1.09, 1.68; p = 0.006) and stress (OR = 1.43 95 % CI 1.11, 1.85; p = 0.006) than survivors with PSA-detected disease.ConclusionsThese findings contribute to the ongoing debate on benefits and risks of PSA testing and may be considered by policy makers formulating population-based prostate cancer screening policies. The relatively high prevalence of negative psychological states among survivors means that a ‘risk-adapted approach’ should be implemented to screen survivors most at risk of psychological morbidity for psychological health, and mode of detection could be considered as a risk stratum.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-015-3033-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
“…We also evaluated potential variables associated with a PSA request that was potentially non-compliant with the current guideline. We speculated that some specific patient characteristics (diabetes diagnosis [ 8 , 9 ], consuming tobacco, alcohol, or other drugs [ 10 , 11 ]) could be associated with lower probability of having a potentially non-compliant PSA test due to lower testing frequency. Nevertheless, although we found no difference in PSA test compliance with the guideline in patients with diabetes diagnoses, those who were current consumers of tobacco, alcohol, and/or other drugs showed 20% lower potential non-compliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSA non-compliance in these patients was partially explained by shorter life expectancy, but patients diagnosed with another neoplasm had an 18% higher frequency of potentially non-compliant PSA petitions after adjusting for age and life expectancy. Available evidence has reported that patients with a previous cancer diagnosis were more likely to have a PSA test [ 10 ], which could be due to increased contact with healthcare services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervals between testing were often shorter than recommended, and screening among younger men without risk factors was frequent [ 7 ]. In addition, a different PSA testing behaviour has been described among patients with certain characteristics, such as men with diabetes [ 8 , 9 ], patients with cancer [ 10 ], or non-smokers [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Scientific societies have provided guidelines to reduce PSA-specific harms. We studied the potential non-compliance of PSA testing with current guidelines in general practice. A cross-sectional study of a random sample of 1291 patients with a PSA test was performed between January and April 2018 in primary health care. Patients with a previous prostate cancer diagnosis or those who were being followed-up for previous high PSA values were excluded. Two independent researchers classified whether each test was potentially non-compliant with recommendations. We estimated frequencies of potentially non-compliant PSA determinations and calculated prevalence ratios (PR) to assess their relationship with possible explanatory variables. A total of 66% (95% CI: 62–69%) of PSA requests in asymptomatic patients were potentially non-compliant with the current guideline. This was associated with having a previous diagnosis of neoplasm (PR adjusted by age and life expectancy: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.02–1.37) as well as being a current consumer of tobacco, alcohol, or other drugs (PR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67–0.97). Real world data shows that patients are still frequently exposed to overdiagnosis risk with a PSA potentially non-compliant with recommendations. Patients diagnosed with another neoplasm or non-consumers of toxic substances were more exposed, probably due to increased contact with doctors or health-seeking behaviour.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.