1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70376-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of tPSA cutoff in 2.5 ng/ml associated to additional criteria for indication of biopsy, such as free/total PSA ratio in 20% or PSAD in 0.08, seemed to represent a better option than employing only tPSA in all other cut-off levels. In the literature, results are controversial and there is no agreement about the best cut-off level for tPSA, as well as about the benefits gained with the associated use of the free/total PSA ratio and tPSA density, but one can note a tendency towards recommending a reduction in the cut-off level of tPSA and applying associated parameters in order to improve the test specificity (4,6). Maybe the most convincing recent multiracial study about the subject involving the screening and the follow-up of 12,902 men, of whom 7,541 were considered without prostate disease, showed that 95% of the sample without disease had tPSA ≤ 2.45 ng/ml, and this is the reason why this value was proposed as the upper limit for normality (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of tPSA cutoff in 2.5 ng/ml associated to additional criteria for indication of biopsy, such as free/total PSA ratio in 20% or PSAD in 0.08, seemed to represent a better option than employing only tPSA in all other cut-off levels. In the literature, results are controversial and there is no agreement about the best cut-off level for tPSA, as well as about the benefits gained with the associated use of the free/total PSA ratio and tPSA density, but one can note a tendency towards recommending a reduction in the cut-off level of tPSA and applying associated parameters in order to improve the test specificity (4,6). Maybe the most convincing recent multiracial study about the subject involving the screening and the follow-up of 12,902 men, of whom 7,541 were considered without prostate disease, showed that 95% of the sample without disease had tPSA ≤ 2.45 ng/ml, and this is the reason why this value was proposed as the upper limit for normality (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are studies showing that in the tPSA range between 2.5 and 4 ng/ml the prevalence of cancer reaches 24%, and that is why many centers started to recommend this cut-off level for indication of biopsy (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a diagnosis of PCa (Arcangeli et al, 1997). A large number of men face the prospect of prostate biopsy with limited information about their likelihood of harboring PCa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, other studies show that PSAD has no value for such discrimination 5 . Others recommend the PSAD at the cut-off level of 0,15 to make a decision on the indication of a 2 nd set prostate biopsy when the 1 st set gave a negative result 6 . The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of PSAD and prostate volume on the performance of PSA to the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma in a subset of patients (with serum PSA £ 10ng/ml) submitted to prostate biopsy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%