2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3835(02)00710-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate cancer risk and exposure to ultraviolet radiation: further support for the protective effect of sunlight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusions on percentage use are supported in a much larger cross-sectional study, published in the same year, of 4147 boys and 5932 girls aged 12-18 yr from all 50 USA states (30). A total of 9.5% had used a sunbed in the previous year, with much greater use by the girls (OR ¼ 7 95%; CI ¼ 5.7-8.7) and with older girls (15)(16)(17)(18) more likely to report use than younger girls (24.6% vs. 4.7%). A smaller study of 210 students, published in 2001 in Texas, reported that 18% had used a tanning bed in the previous 6 months (31).…”
Section: Use Of Tanning Devicesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conclusions on percentage use are supported in a much larger cross-sectional study, published in the same year, of 4147 boys and 5932 girls aged 12-18 yr from all 50 USA states (30). A total of 9.5% had used a sunbed in the previous year, with much greater use by the girls (OR ¼ 7 95%; CI ¼ 5.7-8.7) and with older girls (15)(16)(17)(18) more likely to report use than younger girls (24.6% vs. 4.7%). A smaller study of 210 students, published in 2001 in Texas, reported that 18% had used a tanning bed in the previous 6 months (31).…”
Section: Use Of Tanning Devicesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Overall, it may be concluded that the benefits from tanning by sunbeds are primarily cosmetic and that this process is associated with genetic damage that is known to give rise to skin cancer. However, there has been recent emphasis on possible benefits, with respect to internal malignancies, derived from vitamin D induction by solar UVR (18).…”
Section: Tanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition that 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D exerts a key role in numerous biochemical pathways (Holick, 2005), and that hypovitaminosis is common worldwide (Calvo et al, 2005) has contributed to the idea that low levels of exposure confer increased risk of various diseases including some cancers (Grant, 2002). For example, we found regular holidays abroad and sunbathing were inversely associated with prostate cancer risk (Luscombe et al, 2001;Bodiwala et al, 2003). Independent studies have reported inverse associations between exposure and serum vitamin D levels and prostate cancer risk and mortality (Hanchette and Schwartz, 1992;John et al, 2004;Tuohimaa et al, 2004;John et al, 2005;Schwartz, 2005;Colli and Colli, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Their findings suggest that, first, host factors, such as skin pigmentation, that affect UVBinduced synthesis of vitamin D and, second, polymorphism in genes that mediate the effectiveness of vitamin D action affect the risk for a variety of diseases including prostate cancer. Similarly, Bodiwala et al 121 conducted a study to confirm this hypothesis in 212 prostate adenocarcinoma and 135 BPH patients. Their aim was to determine whether earlier findings showing a protective effect for UVB exposure could be reproduced.…”
Section: Search Strategy and Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 90%