2022
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate Artery Embolization in Patients above Eighty Years Old: Clinical Efficacy and Safety

Abstract: Purpose Prostate artery embolization (PAE) has been established as an effective treatment option for benign prostate hyperplasia or hematuria of prostatic origin. We aim to confirm the effectiveness and safety of PAE in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years old. Materials and Methods Between January 2014 and August 2020, PAE was attempted on 54 elderly patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or prostatic hematuria who were unfit for surgical treatment or opted for PAE. Outcome parameters (Intern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PAE has shown promising efficacy in controlling bleeding and improving LUTS in patients with PCa. Saro et al [ 47 ] confirm the effectiveness and safety of PAE in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years old (mean 85.29, range 80–98). There were significant improvements in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL), showing that PAE is a feasible low-risk treatment for prostatic hematuria also in elderly patients with or without urinary retention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…PAE has shown promising efficacy in controlling bleeding and improving LUTS in patients with PCa. Saro et al [ 47 ] confirm the effectiveness and safety of PAE in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years old (mean 85.29, range 80–98). There were significant improvements in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL), showing that PAE is a feasible low-risk treatment for prostatic hematuria also in elderly patients with or without urinary retention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%