1992
DOI: 10.1016/0090-6980(92)90013-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostaglandin E2 binding site distribution and subtype classification in the rabbit iris-ciliary body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We carried out this assessment by delivering antiglaucoma drugs to the supraciliary space and measuring reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) over time and comparing IOP to that with topical delivery of the same drugs. Both of the drugs used in this study, sulprostone and brimonidine, have sites of action in the ciliary body, [11][12][13] which suggested that supraciliary targeting should be beneficial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We carried out this assessment by delivering antiglaucoma drugs to the supraciliary space and measuring reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) over time and comparing IOP to that with topical delivery of the same drugs. Both of the drugs used in this study, sulprostone and brimonidine, have sites of action in the ciliary body, [11][12][13] which suggested that supraciliary targeting should be beneficial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[8][9][10] As with many antiglaucoma drugs, the site of therapeutic action is the ciliary body. [11][12][13] Also, the poorly targeted nature of eye drops leads to extensive systemic exposure, which causes 8% to 53% of glaucoma patients taking topical antiglaucoma drugs to experience side effects. 14, 15 Poor patient compliance and low bioavailability of glaucoma drugs create the need for a better delivery method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests that 3H-PGE2 binding sites are highly specific. In the rabbit ciliary body, PGE2 and 11-deoxy PGE1 (IC50 of 4.7 and 5.7 nM respectively) are more potent that either 17-phenyl trinor PGE2 or sulprostone in inhibiting 3H-PGE2 binding sites (15) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Distribution Of Binding Sitesmentioning
confidence: 97%