Prospects of legal regulation of relations in the field of artificial intelligence use

Abstract

The study covers the issues of legal regulation of relations in the field of artificial intelligence use. The study mainstreams the issue of whether it is possible to contemplate the legal status of a robot at the present stage of human development, or, on the contrary, all discussions on this issue are premature. Various areas of application, applications of robotics and artificial intelligence are considered. Special attention is paid to the medical field, where with the help of modern technologies it has become possible to develop models for predicting breast cancer, a model of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic people with atherosclerosis, predicting stroke and seasonality of tuberculosis, and predicting the disease in a pandemic. It is argued that the COVID pandemic has reminded the world of the urgent need to intervene in the healthcare industry using artificial intelligence. It is artificial intelligence (AI) that has many applications in pandemic situations – from diagnostics to therapy. Attention is paid to the use of artificial intelligence in the educational, scientific, and research areas. This refers to the fight against the identification of facts of academic dishonesty and plagiarism, to the introduction of new technologies in the educational process. The study considers the existing approaches to the concept, nature, and main features of such categories as “artificial intelligence”, “robot”, and other related concepts in order to understand and comprehend their essence. In the comparative legal aspect, the study examines the RoboLaw project, European Parliament Resolution 2015/2103 (INL), entitled “Civil Law Rules on Robotics” of February 16, 2017, and the Charter of Robotics (the Scientific Foresight Unit, STOA)

Договір Інжинірингу: Міжнародний Досвід У Контексті Публічних Закупівель

“…6 ЦК, що встановлює презумпцію укладення угод, що не суперечать загальним цивільно-правовим засадам та загальноправовим принципам права, як-от сумлінність, розумність і справедливість [5]. Аргументуючи правову природу договору інжинірингу, до непоіменованого його відносять Р. Стефанчук [12], Л. Ситдикова [13] та А. Посадський [14], наголошуючи, що до зазначеного договору має застосовуватись законно-правова аналогія (ст. 8 Цивільного кодексу України).…”