2017
DOI: 10.17582/journal.pjz/2018.50.1.75.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects of Entomopathogenic Bacteria and Fungi for Biological Control of Ricania simulans (Walker 1851) (Hemiptera: Ricaniidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its insecticidal activities were obtained as 86%, 66%, and 27%, respectively. In another study, B. thuringiensis FDP-41, B. thuringiensis FDP-42, and B. subtilis EK-7 isolates were also tested against R. simulans, and the mortality rates of these applications were determined as 25%, 42%, and 25, respectively (Gokturk et al, 2018). Yet in another study, it was reported that B. thuringiensis FDP-41 and B. thuringiensis FDP-42 strains could be used as biocontrol agent against Bruchus dentipes (Tozlu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its insecticidal activities were obtained as 86%, 66%, and 27%, respectively. In another study, B. thuringiensis FDP-41, B. thuringiensis FDP-42, and B. subtilis EK-7 isolates were also tested against R. simulans, and the mortality rates of these applications were determined as 25%, 42%, and 25, respectively (Gokturk et al, 2018). Yet in another study, it was reported that B. thuringiensis FDP-41 and B. thuringiensis FDP-42 strains could be used as biocontrol agent against Bruchus dentipes (Tozlu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of twelve bacterial strains and one fungal isolate used in this study tested for their entomopathogenic activities against pest in controlled and field conditions. Ten of bacterial strains (CP-1, FDP-1, FDP-8, FDP-41, FDP-42, FD-1, EK-7, NEM-28, FD-49, BAB-410) and the fungi (ET 10) were isolated in our previous studies (Tozlu et al, 2011;Dadaşoğlu et al, 2013;Tozlu et al, 2016a;Göktürk et al, 2018;Tozlu et al, 2016b). They were obtained from the culture collection unit in the Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture at Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.…”
Section: Bacterial Strains and Fungal Isolate Used In This Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mulberry and P. pentagona were used as host plant and harmful insect in this study, respectively (Figure 1b). Bacterial strains CP-1, TV-67C and TV-91C were isolated from Ricania simulans, Rubus idaeus and Graminea sp., respectively in previous studies (Table 1) (Göktürk et al, 2018;Erman et al, 2010) and defined in the MIS based on fatty acid methyl esters. Stock cultures of the bacterial strains were kept in Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture Plant Clinical Laboratory (AUFAPCL).…”
Section: Host Plant Harmful Insect and Bacterial Strainsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The bacterial strains and fungal biocontrol isolate the insecticidal effects of which were investigated in the study were obtained from the Ataturk University Faculty of Agriculture Plant Protection Department Culture Collection. Previous studies have determined the effectiveness of a portion of these agents on different plant pests and pathogens (Göktürk et al, 2018;Erman et al, 2010;Tozlu et al, 2011, Dadaşoğlu, 2013, while others were first tested in this study (Table 1). The bacterial biocontrol strains cultured in the Nutrient Agar (NA; Difco) medium were kept in 30% glycerolcontaining Nutrient Broth (NB; Difco) at -80 o C, while the fungal isolate was kept in slant Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Difco) at 4 o C in the Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture Plant Protection Department Culture Collection.…”
Section: Host Plant Pest Bioagent Fungal Isolate and Bacteria Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%