1972
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(72)90080-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects for earthquake prediction and control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed studies by Hollister and Weimer [1] and Healy et al [9] confirmed the causal observations of Evans [10] that the seismic events were induced by the waste fluid injection. Similar relations between local seismicity and fluid injection were likewise observed at the Rangely Oil Field, Colorado by Pakiser et al [11], Healy et al [12] and Gibbs et al [13], and in the Los Angeles basin by Teng et al [14].…”
Section: Effect Of Fluid Injection On Induced Seismicitysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Detailed studies by Hollister and Weimer [1] and Healy et al [9] confirmed the causal observations of Evans [10] that the seismic events were induced by the waste fluid injection. Similar relations between local seismicity and fluid injection were likewise observed at the Rangely Oil Field, Colorado by Pakiser et al [11], Healy et al [12] and Gibbs et al [13], and in the Los Angeles basin by Teng et al [14].…”
Section: Effect Of Fluid Injection On Induced Seismicitysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The results of this paper do not appear to be directly applicable to the Rangely earthquake experiments [Healy et al, 1972]. This is not surprising, since the results apply only to conditions within the reservoir before appreciable fault movement takes place.…”
Section: Discussion Of Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Apparently man-made earthquakes associated with fluid injection have called attention to the effects of fluid pressure on rock failure [Healy et al, 1968[Healy et al, , 1972Sykes et al, 1973]. This behavior can be easily demonstrated in the laboratory [Jaeger and Cook, 1969;Handin et al, 1963] and can be explained by using the concept of effective stress [Terzaghi and Peck, 1948;Nur and Byedee, 1971 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). This made the 1999 Taiwan earthquake distinct and not unlike a few other major earthquakes, such as the 1857 Fort Tejon and the 1906 San Francisco earthquakes (Healy et al, 1972) as well as the 1923 Kanto earthquake (Shimazaki, 1971). Obviously, the occurrence of these earthquakes did not conform with the popular notion that the more microearthquakes there are, the greater is the risk of a strong earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%