2019
DOI: 10.1080/21870764.2019.1656360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects and physical limits of processes and technologies in glass melting

Abstract: The paper is devoted to the physics of continuously operating fuel-fired glass furnaces with supplementary electrical boosting. Furnaces are treated in their basic function as heat exchangers and chemical reactors. First, as an expression of the 1 st law of thermodynamics, a general heat balance is elaborated in detail. The function as heat exchanger is characterized by three dimensionless key indicators: the temperature efficiency (comprising adiabatic flame, glass exit, and environmental temperature), the he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parametric study examines the cases of natural versus forced convection by bubbling and the effects of increased primary foaming (the gas evolution rate, G e ) beneath the cold cap, set at 1G e , 5G e , and 10G e . Corresponding to the typical gas evolution rate from a collapsing primary foam during the melting of high-level waste (HLW) nuclear melter feed, 25 the base set of simulations was performed with a constant G e of 1.71 × 10 −7 kg s −1 for a solid disk. For the cases with forced convection bubbling, the base mass flow rate of 1150°C air from the bubbler is set to 2.26 × 10 −5 kg s −1 (101 slpm m −2 as used in experiments, [21][22][23] where the gas evolution rate is scaled by the cold cap surface area).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parametric study examines the cases of natural versus forced convection by bubbling and the effects of increased primary foaming (the gas evolution rate, G e ) beneath the cold cap, set at 1G e , 5G e , and 10G e . Corresponding to the typical gas evolution rate from a collapsing primary foam during the melting of high-level waste (HLW) nuclear melter feed, 25 the base set of simulations was performed with a constant G e of 1.71 × 10 −7 kg s −1 for a solid disk. For the cases with forced convection bubbling, the base mass flow rate of 1150°C air from the bubbler is set to 2.26 × 10 −5 kg s −1 (101 slpm m −2 as used in experiments, [21][22][23] where the gas evolution rate is scaled by the cold cap surface area).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously stated, landfilling and stockpiling unrecycled soda-lime-silica container glass represents a considerable failure in sustainability considering the extensive energy-consumption and environmental impact associated with its manufacture and distribution (Mishra, 2015;Grbeš, 2016;Conradt, 2019). In response to this problem, recent research has been carried out to synthesize zeolites from flint, amber and green container glasses under various alkaline hydrothermal conditions (Espejel-Ayala et al, 2014;Terzano et al, 2015;Elmes et al, 2018;Lin et al, 2019;Majdinasab and Yuan, 2019a;Majdinasab and Yuan, 2019b;Collins et al, 2020;Taylor et al 2020).…”
Section: Waste Container Glass For the Synthesis Of Zeolitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soda-lime-silica container glass accounts for 45% of the worldwide manufacture of all glasses and typically between 30 and 70% waste cullet is included in the feedstock (Conradt, 2019). It is theoretically possible to recycle up to 90% cullet in the production of new container glass; however, many technical and economic factors give rise to considerable variation in the extent to which it is actually recycled across the globe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is estimated that approximately 200 Mt of waste soda-lime-silica container glass are landfilled per annum [1]. In order to conserve energy and natural resources, it is theoretically possible to recycle up to 90% of waste container glass, although this potential is undermined by a range of geographical, economic and technical challenges [2][3][4]. In particular, poor collection infrastructure and colour mismatch restrict regional demand for coloured waste container glass that can be recycled as new bottles and jars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%