1984
DOI: 10.1016/0305-4403(84)90016-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects and limits of a phytolith key for grasses in the central United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
150
0
9

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
150
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Having summarized our results regarding morphotype frequency, we supported the conclusion of Brown [4] and Marx et al [41]. They argued that interspecific variations of phytolith morphotypes can be observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Having summarized our results regarding morphotype frequency, we supported the conclusion of Brown [4] and Marx et al [41]. They argued that interspecific variations of phytolith morphotypes can be observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is interesting to note that the cross-shaped and saddle-shaped forms were absent in the examined Poa shoots, similarly to Brown's results [4], and at the same time lobated phytoliths were not found, unlike in Poa alpina epidermis where this type is dominant [37]. Only a few prickles (unicellular trichomes), and especially the peak of them could be observed, because long, multicellular trichomes are not typical in this species [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is interesting to note that similar to the results in Brown (1984b), cross-shaped and saddle-shaped forms were absent in the examined Poa pratensis shoots. Only a few prickles (unicellular trichomes), and especially their peaks, could be observed, because long, multicellular trichomes are not typical in this species (Metcalfe, 1960).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…An inherent problem with this method is that phytolith workers differ widely in how finely they subdivide the morphological spectrum encountered in phytolith assemblages in plants or in soil samples, and also in which morphotypes they count. Some authors consider only a very low number of morphotype classes for vegetation inference (e.g., 7 in Alexandre et al, 1997); others subdivide all, or certain, morphotypes into a large number of classes (e.g.. Brown, 1984;Camelli et al, 2004).…”
Section: Concerns For Determining Adequate Count Size In Phytolith Anmentioning
confidence: 99%