2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeps.2015.07.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects and Limitations of Chemical and Isotopic Groundwater Monitoring to Assess the Potential Environmental Impacts of Unconventional Oil and Gas Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the exception of sample C1 (with δ 13 C CH4 values of −46.3‰ and δD CH4 values of −194‰), the measured δ 13 C CH4 in the FRS gas samples range from −52.4 to −68.3‰, and δD CH4 values vary between −220 and −284‰. The majority of δ 13 C CH4 values are comparable to those measured for shallow mud gases obtained during initial drilling at the FRS site (Mayer et al, 2015;2018). These values are also consistent with average values recorded in Groundwater Observation Wells near to the FRS (−66.2%; Humez et al, 2016) and other nearby sedimentary basins such as the Williston basin (Hendry et al, 2016;.…”
Section: Major Gas and Stable Isotope Compositionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the exception of sample C1 (with δ 13 C CH4 values of −46.3‰ and δD CH4 values of −194‰), the measured δ 13 C CH4 in the FRS gas samples range from −52.4 to −68.3‰, and δD CH4 values vary between −220 and −284‰. The majority of δ 13 C CH4 values are comparable to those measured for shallow mud gases obtained during initial drilling at the FRS site (Mayer et al, 2015;2018). These values are also consistent with average values recorded in Groundwater Observation Wells near to the FRS (−66.2%; Humez et al, 2016) and other nearby sedimentary basins such as the Williston basin (Hendry et al, 2016;.…”
Section: Major Gas and Stable Isotope Compositionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Hence, monitoring the subsurface fluids for an increase in CO 2 alone may not be sufficient to robustly identify the upward migration of injected CO 2 . Furthermore, as the stratigraphy of the site contains both abundant CH 4 and coal seams, and the shallow groundwaters are variably CH 4 saturated (Mayer et al, 2015;Cheung, 2019) it is possible that any upwardly migrating CO 2 could be absorbed onto the coal seams, if permeable (Ceglarska-Stefańska and Zarbska 2002) resulting in both desorption of CH 4 from the coals (Zhang and Liu 2017) and potential exsolution of CH 4 from groundwaters (Soltanian et al, 2018). A potentially useful consequence of the desorption process could be that monitoring for any increases in CH 4 in the ground gases may provide and alternative monitoring tool for the migration of CO 2 from the injection formation.…”
Section: Recommendations For Geochemical Monitoring Of Co 2 Migration...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monitoring during the activity of the site may be better focused than initial investigations of gas emission baselines over large areas. However, as shown for the Weyburn case, and other CCS test sites or demonstrators, as well as for areas with active unconventional gas exploitation, intrinsic fingerprinting of gas species as well as investigating chemical and isotopic characteristics of groundwater bears a great potential for system failure detection [68][69][70][71][72][73] and will usefully complete the identification and quantification of gas emanations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petroleum exploration, extraction, transport and processing involve an inevitable risk of contamination [28,29]. The quantity and the composition of the oil spill, as well as the size of the contamination area, determine the seriousness of the pollution [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%