2014
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospectively Assessed Clinical Outcomes in Concussive Blast vs Nonblast Traumatic Brain Injury Among Evacuated US Military Personnel

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Blast injury has been identified as the signature injury in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. However it remains to be determined whether fundamental differences may exist between blast-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) and TBI due to other mechanisms.OBJECTIVES To determine similarities and differences between clinical outcomes in US military personnel with blast-related vs. non-blast-related concussive TBI and to identify the specific domains of impairment that best correlate with overall … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(34 reference statements)
3
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a recent study of active duty soldiers showed that recent concussion, independent of injury mechanism or combat exposure, is predictive of persistent post-concussive complaints. 54 Thus, although these findings are consistent with research that failed to find independent evidence for the presence or absence of previous concussion, the evidence of recent and multiple concussion across a range of emotional distress, post-concussive symptom, and neurocognitive functioning is in contrast with other studies that failed to find a unique contribution for concussion across a wide range of persistent post-concussive symptoms. 18,55 Possible reasons for this may include the failure of other studies to include both objective and subjective assessments of functioning, assessment of a wide range of PPCS including neurocognitive, selfreport emotional and somatic symptoms, and, most importantly, the distinction between single and multiple concussion, and its recency.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Indeed, a recent study of active duty soldiers showed that recent concussion, independent of injury mechanism or combat exposure, is predictive of persistent post-concussive complaints. 54 Thus, although these findings are consistent with research that failed to find independent evidence for the presence or absence of previous concussion, the evidence of recent and multiple concussion across a range of emotional distress, post-concussive symptom, and neurocognitive functioning is in contrast with other studies that failed to find a unique contribution for concussion across a wide range of persistent post-concussive symptoms. 18,55 Possible reasons for this may include the failure of other studies to include both objective and subjective assessments of functioning, assessment of a wide range of PPCS including neurocognitive, selfreport emotional and somatic symptoms, and, most importantly, the distinction between single and multiple concussion, and its recency.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Similar symptoms and brain pathology have been reported following multiple mTBI in other contact sports, particularly American football, and termed chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) [9][10][11][12]. Delayed chronic neuropsychiatric alterations following repeated concussions have also been increasingly recognized in military personnel exposed to improvised explosive devices [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…93 Our chronic mTBI patients showed some affective problems (higher depression and PTSD scores) and cognitive problems (slower reaction time, poorer memory performance, reduced verbal fluency) in the neuropsychological tests, consistent with previously published studies. 32,51,75 Analysis of the scatter plots of the neuropsychological scores, however, indicated that the distributions for chronic mTBI patients and matched controls showed considerable overlap, even on tests that revealed significant group differences between patients and controls. Further, there was no correlation (except for WTAR scores) between neuropsychological measures or affective disorders and BOLD signal magnitudes.…”
Section: Poor Accuracy Of Behavioral Tests In Identifying Individual mentioning
confidence: 98%