2020
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Validation of Gallium-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
59
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Good intra-observer agreement for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases using 18 F-DFCPyL PET/CT was observed (95%). Our results appear to be in line with a recent prospective 68 Ga-PSMA study from van Kalmthout et al [16]. This study used a similar methodology to our study (n = 103 patients), applying the same standardized ePLND techniques, histopathology analyses and PET positivity criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Good intra-observer agreement for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases using 18 F-DFCPyL PET/CT was observed (95%). Our results appear to be in line with a recent prospective 68 Ga-PSMA study from van Kalmthout et al [16]. This study used a similar methodology to our study (n = 103 patients), applying the same standardized ePLND techniques, histopathology analyses and PET positivity criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This study used a similar methodology to our study (n = 103 patients), applying the same standardized ePLND techniques, histopathology analyses and PET positivity criteria. It revealed a patient-based sensitivity for lymphnode metastases of 41.5% (95%CI 26.7-57.8) and a specificity of 90.9% (95%CI 79.3-96.6) [16]. Although accuracy was similar, we should note that the prevalence of lymph-node metastases in their study was much higher (42.3% vs. our 14.5%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to notice that this was a highly selected subpopulation with a massive selection bias, as the patients scheduled for surgery are usually deemed free of metastatic disease by 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT beforehand. Our sensitivity was on par with comparable studies (RP with PLND) reporting sensitivities spanning from 33-42% (25)(26)(27)(28). This selection bias is illustrated by the much higher sensitivity found by Hofman et al, in their recent prospective study of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in a less preselected group (6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These authors specifically identified difficulties (sampling errors, missed nodes) in using histopathology of resected nodes as ground truth, so they reported their numbers on patient level rather than on nodal level and incorporated 6-month follow-up with repeated imaging for validation. Contrary to these high values, other recent data show low sensitivities of PSMA PET-CT in the detection of lymph node metastases of 42%, 40 41% (SALT trial), 41 and 31% 42 at high specificities of 91%, 94%, and 97% respectively. In these studies, the median size of missed metastases was 3 mm or less, significantly smaller than the median size of detected metastases (exemplified in Fig.…”
Section: Why Are Lymph Nodes Important For Oncologic Staging?mentioning
confidence: 65%