2013
DOI: 10.3171/2013.3.jns122032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective validation of a patient-reported nasal quality-of-life tool for endonasal skull base surgery: The Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12

Abstract: Object Patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) end points are becoming increasingly important health care metrics. To date, no nasal morbidity instrument specifically designed for patients undergoing endonasal skull base surgery has been developed. In this study, the authors describe the development and validation of a site-specific nasal morbidity instrument to assess patient-reported rhinological outcomes following endonasal skull base surgery. Methods Eligible patients included those with planned endonasal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Endoscopic cases had a better rhinological outcome. Hong et al compared outcomes of patients undergoing unilateral microscopic and bilateral endoscopic surgery using the ASK nasal inventory, a derivative of the recently introduced ASK Nasal‐12; microsurgical cases showed better scores 3 months after surgery . Here, a further follow‐up would be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Endoscopic cases had a better rhinological outcome. Hong et al compared outcomes of patients undergoing unilateral microscopic and bilateral endoscopic surgery using the ASK nasal inventory, a derivative of the recently introduced ASK Nasal‐12; microsurgical cases showed better scores 3 months after surgery . Here, a further follow‐up would be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hong et al compared outcomes of patients undergoing unilateral microscopic and bilateral endoscopic surgery using the ASK nasal inventory, a derivative of the recently introduced ASK Nasal-12; microsurgical cases showed better scores 3 months after surgery. [17][18][19] Here, a further follow-up would be necessary. In another comparative study of microscopical and bilateral endoscopical surgery, Pledger et al found no significant difference between the late postoperative SNOT-20 scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Secondary supplementary end points included health status estimated by patient scores on the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) at the same time points and sinus endoscopy findings performed at various times after surgery. 17 The presence or absence and severity of mucopurulence, synechia, and crusting were recorded during nasal endoscopy.…”
Section: Study End Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Secondary supplementary end points included health status estimated by patient scores on the 8-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8). 7,32 The EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L was also administered to patients at the lead site.…”
Section: Study End Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%