2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Validation of a Demographically Based Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Size Calculator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were able to predict the tibial component size in 87% (n ¼ 412/474) and 76% (n ¼ 360/474) of femoral components [9]. This study has been further validated by the same group, and an electronic application has been developed for clinical use [13]. Considering the relatively small number (n ¼ 21) of the systems chosen for our study included in this validation study by the same group leaves some questions regarding the application of their study to multiple TKA systems and at other institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were able to predict the tibial component size in 87% (n ¼ 412/474) and 76% (n ¼ 360/474) of femoral components [9]. This study has been further validated by the same group, and an electronic application has been developed for clinical use [13]. Considering the relatively small number (n ¼ 21) of the systems chosen for our study included in this validation study by the same group leaves some questions regarding the application of their study to multiple TKA systems and at other institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Considering our institution performs a high volume of TKA, the primary purpose of this study was to investigate the ability to predict the tibial and femoral component size in a single implant system from patient characteristics, such as sex, weight, and height. A secondary goal was to compare the predicted tibial and femoral component sizes from our statistical model with the electronic application designed by Sershon (Arthroplasty Size Predictor, Apple App Store, 2017) [13]. Being able to accurately predict component sizes for those undergoing primary TKA surgery may improve operating room efficiency, decrease the total operative time, decrease operative waste, and decrease facility cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several studies have been published that support predicting TKA component size based on demographic data. All authors report R 2 values ranging 0.50 to 0.79 and accuracy within one size in 85% to 100% of cases [8][9][10][11]24]. Recently, the equations presented by Bhowmik-Stoker et al were shown to be most accurate when applied to a unique patient population, still averaging within one size 88 and 92% of the time for femoral and tibial sizes, respectively [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Height, weight, body mass index, age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores were extracted for all patients and used as the combination of features incorporated into algorithm training (Table 1). These variables were selected based off of prior studies investigating prediction of TKA component sizes, which have demonstrated that these demographic variables hold the greatest predictive value [8,9,20]. American Society of Anesthesiologists score was included as it has demonstrated statistical associations with BMI and may therefore have an influence on these parameters that influence component size [21].…”
Section: Covariates and Missing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability in the accuracy of standard preoperative templating, in addition to the costs associated with preoperative imaging and patient-specific instrumentation, [6] poses a challenge to this end and necessitates more efficient and accurate planning methods [5,7]. Previous attempts at demographic-based final implant prediction have demonstrated acceptable accuracy ranging between 71% and 97%, although these models were designed to predict implant ranges of one size under or over the actual implant size [8,9]. Given the range in both the accuracy and variability of implant size predictions in such models, there remains a need for a more accurate and consistent prediction model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%