2015
DOI: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20150412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective study of treatment of extraarticular fractures of distal end radius by cross K wire fixation and cast immobilisation and its comparison with Kapandji's method of intrafocal pinning anatomically and functionally

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The therapeutic gape between external fixators and plaster immobilization is bridged by percutaneous pin fixation in the management of fractures of distal radius 15 , it provides an additional stability to immobilization in a cast in unstable extra articular radial fractures in which anatomical reduction is required. 16 In osteoprotic old age cases and in severely comminuted cases, this method give less encouraging results and is unsuitable for these patients, but as it is very simple to use and less intrusive than other methods like external fixation. 17 The average age in our study was 34.72 +4.63, the male were 55.6% and female 44.4%, with male to female ratio of 1:1.3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The therapeutic gape between external fixators and plaster immobilization is bridged by percutaneous pin fixation in the management of fractures of distal radius 15 , it provides an additional stability to immobilization in a cast in unstable extra articular radial fractures in which anatomical reduction is required. 16 In osteoprotic old age cases and in severely comminuted cases, this method give less encouraging results and is unsuitable for these patients, but as it is very simple to use and less intrusive than other methods like external fixation. 17 The average age in our study was 34.72 +4.63, the male were 55.6% and female 44.4%, with male to female ratio of 1:1.3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%