2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Study of the Radiolabeled GRPR Antagonist BAY86-7548 for Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
11
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that both tracers show a "different localization of lesions but similar semiquantitative measurements". A comparable conclusion was drawn by Touijer et al who compared RM2-PET of PCa with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry [38]. They state that "GRPR expression appears to be independent from PSMA expression suggesting that GRPR-and PSMA-targeted PET imaging may be complementary".…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They concluded that both tracers show a "different localization of lesions but similar semiquantitative measurements". A comparable conclusion was drawn by Touijer et al who compared RM2-PET of PCa with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry [38]. They state that "GRPR expression appears to be independent from PSMA expression suggesting that GRPR-and PSMA-targeted PET imaging may be complementary".…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…next to the bowel [35]. Recently, several studies showed promising results in further comparing RM2-PET and PSMA-PET in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer [36], in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate-or high-risk prostate cancer [37] and in comparing RM2-PET of PCa with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry [38]. Schollhammer et al even compared [Ga68]Ga-PSMA-617-PET/CT…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances of 68 Ga-RM2 PET/CT imaging did not significantly differ compared to mpMRI in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Moreover, 68 Ga-RM2 binding did not correlate with Gleason score [24]. To date, no intra-patient comparison of PSMA and GRP-R targeting at initial staging was reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data from GRP-R immunohistochemistry and our results did not necessarily translate into parallel findings at patient imaging in pilot studies. For instance, the only two GRP-R imaging study, performed at the initial staging of prostate cancer, did not show any correlation (positive or negative) between SUV max on PET/CT and Gleason scores [10, 24]. However, only 1/16 prostate cancers in the study by Touijer et al and 2/17 in the study by Zhang et al were Gleason 6 [10, 24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the frequent overexpression of GRPR in prostate cancer, several bombesin radiopharmaceuticals have been tested in humans for PCa disease detection, including [ 68 Ga]RM2, [ 68 Ga]BAY86-7548, and [ 64 Cu]-CB-TE2A-AR06, among others. Studies reveal high-contrast detection of disseminated and primary disease (83)(84)(85)(86). While GRPR expression may not be as ubiquitous on prostate cancer cells as PSMA, there is no background target expression in the kidneys or salivary glands.…”
Section: Grpr Bombesinmentioning
confidence: 99%