2011
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-1244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Study of Self-Reported Diabetes and Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers

Abstract: Background: Although gastric noncardia adenocarcinoma (GNCA) incidence rates in the United States have decreased, the rates of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EADC) have increased. Obesity increases the risks of GCA and EADC, and the associations may be partially mediated by insulin resistance. A few case-control studies have shown an association between diabetes and an increased risk of EADC.Methods: We prospectively examined the association between diabetes and upper gastro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, for gastric cancer, when all subtypes are considered together, there is a large body of evidence suggesting a weak association of DM with gastric cancer (overall OR about 1.1-1.2), which is especially skewed toward females and Southeast Asians [40]. Three case-control studies have addressed specifically the relationship between DM and gastric GCA using case-control designs [41][42][43]. Two were from the USA [42,43] and one was from Australia [41], and all used the standard GCA Siewert type 2/3 definition, with DM being self-reported in each study.…”
Section: Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, for gastric cancer, when all subtypes are considered together, there is a large body of evidence suggesting a weak association of DM with gastric cancer (overall OR about 1.1-1.2), which is especially skewed toward females and Southeast Asians [40]. Three case-control studies have addressed specifically the relationship between DM and gastric GCA using case-control designs [41][42][43]. Two were from the USA [42,43] and one was from Australia [41], and all used the standard GCA Siewert type 2/3 definition, with DM being self-reported in each study.…”
Section: Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three case-control studies have addressed specifically the relationship between DM and gastric GCA using case-control designs [41][42][43]. Two were from the USA [42,43] and one was from Australia [41], and all used the standard GCA Siewert type 2/3 definition, with DM being self-reported in each study. Only one of the studies reported a significant association between DM and GCA, suggesting that the relationship between obesity and GCA is unlikely to be due entirely to the prevalence of DM.…”
Section: Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these 17 studies, nine were cohorts, using incidence and/or mortality rate ratios as the measure of RR [18][19][20][21]23,45,[47][48][49] and eight were diabetic cohorts, using standardized incidence ratio/standardized mortality ratio as the measure of RR [16,17,22,24,[42][43][44]46]. The former nine cohorts included 7 617 638 participants (range: 18 006-4 501 578), and the latter eight diabetic cohorts included 409 048 participants (range: 5066-125 126) with diabetes.…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the relationship of diabetes with GC development, inconsistent results have been reported [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The purpose of this study was to summarize all available evidence from observational studies to estimate the risk of GC in patients with diabetes following the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, the association between DM and gastric cancer remains to be clarified. Some prospective studies reported that DM determined by questionnaire or medical records is positively associated with gastric cancer, [3][4][5][6] but others found a null association. [7][8][9][10][11][12] However, DM can be easily misclassified when based on self-report of disease in questionnaire survey or medical records.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%