Prospective Study of Periapically Infected Teeth Treated With Periapical Surgery Including Ultrasonic Preparation and Retrograde Intermediate Restorative Material Root-End Fillings

Wälivaara, Dan-Åke; Abrahamsson, Peter; Isaksson, Sten; Blomqvist, John-Eric; Sämfors, Kjell-Arne

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.077

Cited by 25 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Four retrograde root-filling materials are tested in clinical studies in our unit, analyzing their healing capabilities. Our clinical results from intermediate restorative material (IRM) and gutta-percha (GP) and reinforced zinc oxide (Super-EBA) have been published previously [2][3][4], and the results for MTA are waiting due to an ongoing study.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of 4 different bone graft substitutes and autogenous bone grafting in root-end resection osteotomies after retrograde root-filling with Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM): An experimental study in dogs

Wälivaara¹,

Abrahamsson²

2013

OJST

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of 4 different bone graft substitutes and autogenous bone grafting in root-end resection osteotomies after retrograde root-filling with Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM): An experimental study in dogs

Wälivaara¹,

Abrahamsson²

2013

OJST

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The cement consists of thin hydrophilic particles that set in a humid environment after 3-4h at a of pH 12.5. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA Angelus) is composed of tricalcium (66.1%) and dicalcium (8.4%) silicate, tricalcium aluminate (2.0%), calcium sulfate (5.0%), and bismuth oxide (14%), 1 , being indicated for direct pulp capping, in perforations, apexations and as a retrofilling material. 13,14 Biodentine was commercially released in 2009 as a dentin substitute.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Push-out bond strength of different tricalcium silicate-based filling materials to root dentin

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Push-out bond strength of different tricalcium silicate-based filling materials to root dentin Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of different triccalcium silicate cements to retrograde cavity using a push out test. Thirty maxillary central incisors were shaped using #80 hand files and sectioned transversally. Root slices were obtained from the apical 4 mm after eliminating the apical extremity. The specimens were embedded in acrylic resin and positioned at 45° to the horizontal plane for preparation of root-end cavities with a diamond ultrasonic retrotip. The samples were divided into three groups according to the root-end filling material (n = 10): MTA Angelus, ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. A gutta-percha cone (#80) was tugged-back at the limit between the canal and the root-end cavity. The root-end cavity was filled and the gutta-percha cone was removed after complete setting of the materials. The specimens were placed in an Instron machine with the root-end filling turned downwards. The push-out shaft was inserted in the space previously occupied by the gutta-percha cone and push out testing was performed at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. There was no statistically significant difference in resistance to push out by the materials tested (p > 0.01). MTA Angelus and ProRoot MTA showed predominantly mixed failure while Biodentine exhibited mixed and cohesive failures. The tricalcium silicate-based root-end filling materials showed similar bond strength retrograde cavity.

show abstract

“…Their clinical results from intermediate restorative material (IRM), gutta-percha (GP), and ethoxybensoic acid (Super-EBA) have been published previously, [3][4][5] and the results for mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) are awaiting an ongoing study.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Periapical Tissue Response After Use of Intermediate Restorative Material, Gutta-Percha, Reinforced Zinc Oxide Cement, and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as Retrograde Root-End Filling Materials: A Histologic Study in Dogs

Wälivaara¹,

Abrahamsson²,

Isaksson³

et al. 2012

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prospective Study of Periapically Infected Teeth Treated With Periapical Surgery Including Ultrasonic Preparation and Retrograde Intermediate Restorative Material Root-End Fillings

Cited by 25 publications

References 23 publications

Evaluation of 4 different bone graft substitutes and autogenous bone grafting in root-end resection osteotomies after retrograde root-filling with Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM): An experimental study in dogs

Evaluation of 4 different bone graft substitutes and autogenous bone grafting in root-end resection osteotomies after retrograde root-filling with Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM): An experimental study in dogs

Push-out bond strength of different tricalcium silicate-based filling materials to root dentin

Periapical Tissue Response After Use of Intermediate Restorative Material, Gutta-Percha, Reinforced Zinc Oxide Cement, and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as Retrograde Root-End Filling Materials: A Histologic Study in Dogs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About