2006
DOI: 10.1097/00003643-200606001-00718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective study of central venous catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection in intensive care unit, echocardiographic follow-up after catheter removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A CVC was removed when there was a suspicion of skin or CVC infection, when the CVC was no longer needed, and after 14 days (except in burn patients, in whom the indwelling time is recommended not to exceed 4-5 days). The duration of catheterization is based on the incidence of CVC infection from our unit infection control programme [14] and infection control programmes from other institutions [15,16]. If the risk of obtaining new venous access was higher than leaving the CVC in place, the CVC was left in situ more than 14 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CVC was removed when there was a suspicion of skin or CVC infection, when the CVC was no longer needed, and after 14 days (except in burn patients, in whom the indwelling time is recommended not to exceed 4-5 days). The duration of catheterization is based on the incidence of CVC infection from our unit infection control programme [14] and infection control programmes from other institutions [15,16]. If the risk of obtaining new venous access was higher than leaving the CVC in place, the CVC was left in situ more than 14 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%