2019
DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective study of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions in eyes not responsive to long‐term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab

Abstract: Importance: To examine the effect of switching from intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab to aflibercept in eyes with persistent macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Background: We report the results of a prospective interventional study on the effect of aflibercept 2 mg in eyes with persistent macular oedema after long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Design: Non-randomized, prospective clinical trial. Participants: Eighteen eyes of eighteen patients were included.Methods: Eyes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for treatment switch were not collected. A small number of retrospective studies and small case series have investigated switching [28], as well as a small prospective trial which found that some patients unresponsive to one anti-VEGF treatment can benefit from switching to another [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for treatment switch were not collected. A small number of retrospective studies and small case series have investigated switching [28], as well as a small prospective trial which found that some patients unresponsive to one anti-VEGF treatment can benefit from switching to another [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eligibility criteria have been detailed previously. [ 19 ] Briefly, participants had center involving macular edema due to RVO confirmed by fundus fluorescein angiography; BCVA between 34 and 73 letters (Snellen equivalent of between 20/200-20/40); presence of central edema >320 μm as measured on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) with documented prior suboptimal response. Suboptimal response was defined as ≤5 letter gain (and vision loss) in BCVA, or reduction of <20% CMT on SD OCT after at least 4 previous intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab in the 6 months prior to baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of RCTs may not reflect real-world effectiveness, since the actual practices in clinics may differ from the conditions strictly controlled by RCTs. Inadequate or non-standard treatment in clinical practice often leads to unsatisfactory treatment outcomes, requiring additional injections or switching to a different anti-VEGF drug [9][10] or dexamethasone implants (DEX) [11][12] in followup visits. Several retrospective real-world studies [13][14][15] that used 1+PRN or 3+PRN treatment regimens reported mean numbers of injections in the first year of 3.7 to 7.6, and a mean improvement in visual acuity (VA) of 8.0 to 14.8 letters at month 12, indicating that fewer injections in real clinical practices may result in unsatisfied BCVA improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%