1993
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90275-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective study of aetiology and outcome of adult lower-respiratory-tract infections in the community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
206
2
21

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
14
206
2
21
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of community-acquired pneumonia is higher in elderly than in young adults [3,16]. This period of life is characterized by the occurrence of chronic and debilitating conditions, which tend to be more frequent in males and have been found to be a major risk factor for community-acquired pneumonia [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of community-acquired pneumonia is higher in elderly than in young adults [3,16]. This period of life is characterized by the occurrence of chronic and debilitating conditions, which tend to be more frequent in males and have been found to be a major risk factor for community-acquired pneumonia [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chest radiographs are also only of limited value in the imaging of mild infiltrates [12,13]. Moreover, since only every 10th or 20th patient with LRTI is expected to have true pneumonia [14], thus resulting in a low prevalence, the positive predictive value of any diagnostic rule will be low. Thus, a sharp distinction will not be possible in every case of mild LRTI.…”
Section: Detecting Mild Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] En nuestro estudio, los casos de NAC fueron identificados en base a los códigos CIE-9 registrados como diagnóstico en las historias clínicas electrónicas de atención primaria y/o listados de altas hospitalarias y de los servicios de urgencia de referencia de la cohorte de estudio. Sin embargo, todos los casos fueron radiológicamente confirmados y validados mediante revisión de la historia clínica; por lo tanto, es improbable una sobreestimación de la incidencia.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified