2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0156-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Study Comparing Multi‐Detector Row CT and Endoscopy in Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Abstract: Considering the advantages of MDCT over endoscopy, we propose a new diagnostic algorithm for AGIB.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
51
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a meta-analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography in acute GI bleeding was 85.2% sensitivity (95% CI 75.5-91.5) and 92.1% specificity (95% CI 76.7-97.7), showing excellent accuracy [65]. Also, in a cross-sectional study on performing CT angiography after colonoscopy, the accuracy of diagnosing the site of bleeding, and thus the lesion, was higher with CT angiography than with colonoscopy [59]. In colonoscopy, the accuracy of diagnosing the source of bleeding ranges from 52.9 to 91% [59,60,63,64].…”
Section: Quality Of Evidence: C Strength Of Recommendation: Probably mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to a meta-analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography in acute GI bleeding was 85.2% sensitivity (95% CI 75.5-91.5) and 92.1% specificity (95% CI 76.7-97.7), showing excellent accuracy [65]. Also, in a cross-sectional study on performing CT angiography after colonoscopy, the accuracy of diagnosing the site of bleeding, and thus the lesion, was higher with CT angiography than with colonoscopy [59]. In colonoscopy, the accuracy of diagnosing the source of bleeding ranges from 52.9 to 91% [59,60,63,64].…”
Section: Quality Of Evidence: C Strength Of Recommendation: Probably mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Also, in a cross-sectional study on performing CT angiography after colonoscopy, the accuracy of diagnosing the site of bleeding, and thus the lesion, was higher with CT angiography than with colonoscopy [59]. In colonoscopy, the accuracy of diagnosing the source of bleeding ranges from 52.9 to 91% [59,60,63,64]. However, unlike CT angiography and scintigraphy, colonoscopy enables treatment directly after diagnosis [58,60,[63][64][65].…”
Section: Quality Of Evidence: C Strength Of Recommendation: Probably mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to a meta-analysis of 14 studies by Zuckerman and Prakash [17], endoscopy leads to a successful diagnosis in between 70 and 90% of patients, with lower sensitivities in the case of lower GIB of about 50% [7,[18][19][20] than in upper GIB.…”
Section: Endoscopy and Enteroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%