2008
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2008.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective single-arm study of pegfilgrastim activity and safety in children with poor-risk malignant tumours receiving chemotherapy

Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an injection of 100 lg/kg of pegfilgrastim in haematopoietic recovery and mobilization in children following 32 courses of chemotherapy. End points were duration of neutropaenia, myeloid recovery and PBMC collection. Neutropaenia lasted a mean of 4.7 days ( ± 2.13 days). Myeloid recovery occurred at a median of 10 days (inter quartile range (IQR) 8-11). Febrile neutropaenia complicated 13 courses (40.6%). Mobilization was observed in 20 out of 26 assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the use of pegfilgrastim resulted in 83% of patients being classified as good mobilizers, while the required target dose of CD34+ from a single leukapheresis was collected from 62% of patients. A previous single‐center, uncontrolled study by Dallorso and colleagues 19 showed that the use of pegfilgrastim in 28 children and adolescents resulted in 76.9% being classified as good mobilizers, but that group was not completely comparable with our study group because it included three patients who underwent repeated courses of mobilization; moreover, the underlying diseases were represented mostly by neuroblastoma, in half of the population, while no patients affected by acute leukemia or Hodgkin's disease were included. To assess the efficacy of pegfilgrastim we compared the results with those obtained in a historical control group, stimulated with filgrastim and matched for at least two of three characteristics such as type of underlying disease, sex, and age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the use of pegfilgrastim resulted in 83% of patients being classified as good mobilizers, while the required target dose of CD34+ from a single leukapheresis was collected from 62% of patients. A previous single‐center, uncontrolled study by Dallorso and colleagues 19 showed that the use of pegfilgrastim in 28 children and adolescents resulted in 76.9% being classified as good mobilizers, but that group was not completely comparable with our study group because it included three patients who underwent repeated courses of mobilization; moreover, the underlying diseases were represented mostly by neuroblastoma, in half of the population, while no patients affected by acute leukemia or Hodgkin's disease were included. To assess the efficacy of pegfilgrastim we compared the results with those obtained in a historical control group, stimulated with filgrastim and matched for at least two of three characteristics such as type of underlying disease, sex, and age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Pegfilgrastim was administered subcutaneously as a single injection of 100 µg/kg, up to a maximum of 6 mg, on Day +3 after the end of chemotherapy. The dose of 100 µg/kg of pegfilgrastim was chosen by reference to published pediatric experience 12‐19 . Blood count was checked every 2 to 3 days until the nadir of white blood cells (WBCs) was reached and then every 1 to 2 days until PBSC collection by leukapheresis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the experience with Peg-GCSF comes from its use for prophylaxis and treatment of chemotherapy associated neutropenia in children and adults as well as for PBSC mobilisation in adults (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). There is paucity of literature of successful use of Peg-GCSF and its appropriate dosing for PBSC mobilisation in children (1,6,(15)(16)(17). We report our experience of PBSC mobilisation with Peg-GCSF in 9 children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] In children, the data on pegfilgrastim are very limited and refer to the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and chemo-induced stem cell mobilization. [8][9][10][11] The objective of this phase IIA study was to evaluate the percentage of children achieving steady-state mobilization of HPCs using pegfilgrastim, that is, an optimal harvest of 5 Â 10 6 CD34 þ cells/kg in one standard apheresis (p3 blood volumes processed (BVP)) after a single injection of 300 mg/kg pegfilgrastim.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%