Prospective randomized trial of metal versus resorbable plates in surgical stabilization of rib fractures

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Surgical stabilization of rib fractures has gained popularity as both metal and resorbable plates have been approved for fracture repair. Is there a difference between metal and resorbable plate rib fixation regarding rib fracture alignment, control of pain, and quality-of-life (QOL) scores (Rand SF-36 survey)? METHODS:Eligible patients (pts) included 18 years or older with one or more of the following: flail chest, one or more bicortical displaced fractures (3-10), nondisplaced fractures with failure of medical management. Patients were randomized to either metal or resorbable plate fixation. Primary outcome was fracture alignment. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, opioid use, and QOL scores. RESULTS:Thirty pts were randomized (15 metal/15 resorbable). Total ribs plated 167 (88 metal/79 resorbable). Patients with rib displacement at day of discharge (DOD) metal 0/14 (one pt died, not from plating) versus resorbable 9/15 or 60% (p = 0.001). Ribs displaced at DOD metal 0/88 versus resorbable 22/79 or 28% (p < 0.001), 48% in posterior location. Patients with increased rib displacement 3 months to 6 months: metal, 0/11 versus resorbable, 3/9 or 33% (p = 0.043). Ribs with increased displacement 3 months to 6 months metal 0 of 67 versus resorbable 6 of 49 or 12.2% (p < 0.004). Pain scores and narcotic use at postoperative Days 1, 2, 3, DOD, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months showed no statistically significant difference between groups. QOL scores were also similar at 3 months and 6 months.Trauma recidivism in outpatient period resulted in fracture of resorbable plates in two pts requiring a second surgery. CONCLUSION:Metal plates provided better initial alignment with no displacement over time. Clinical outcomes were similar regarding pain, narcotic use, and QOL scores. Routine use of resorbable plates for posterior rib fractures is not warranted. Lateral repairs were technically most feasible for using resorbable plates but still resulted in significant displacement. Resorbable plates may not maintain rib alignment when exposed to subsequent injury.

When to proceed to surgical rib fixation?—A single-institution clinical experience

“…As we described a technique using plates and intramedullary splints, we should be aware of the risk of rare and life-threatening organ injury (41) and consider other types of fixtures (42). Even though, Marasco et al highlighted the risk of failure of SSRF of the posterior portion of the rib with one resorbable device (43) but should be used carefully (44). SSRF is difficult to perform in the posterior part of the rib and we may question the necessity to fix all fractures?…”