2020
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective randomized trial of endoscopic vs open radial artery harvest for CABG: Clinical outcome, patient satisfaction, and midterm RA graft patency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When exploring the different techniques used to harvest the RA, a prospective randomized trial, comparing endoscopic RA harvest versus open technique, showed no negative affect in the length of harvested RA, harvest time, conduit quality, occurrence of hand and forearm complications, and wound healing ( 40 ). The GEA, on the other hand, can be harvested as skeletonized or pedicled with skeletonization reported to be remarkably superior by preventing vasoconstriction, with the conduit remaining wider and longer ( 41 ).…”
Section: Conduits For Cabgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When exploring the different techniques used to harvest the RA, a prospective randomized trial, comparing endoscopic RA harvest versus open technique, showed no negative affect in the length of harvested RA, harvest time, conduit quality, occurrence of hand and forearm complications, and wound healing ( 40 ). The GEA, on the other hand, can be harvested as skeletonized or pedicled with skeletonization reported to be remarkably superior by preventing vasoconstriction, with the conduit remaining wider and longer ( 41 ).…”
Section: Conduits For Cabgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, when used with nitrate during the angiography operation did not significantly alter the outcomes. Verapamil does not increase the antagonist effect against radial spasm, despite its relationship with nitrate and the creation of temporary heart block [18][19] . In the current study, it was discovered that male patients underwent angiography more frequently than female patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Third, minimally invasive or endoscopic harvesting for SV or arterial conduits were not evaluated as are not routinely performed in our center. Despite the recent interest and apparent benefits, 44,45 whether using these techniques would have reduced blood consumption in the SV‐CABG remains unknown. In fact, previous studies comparing endoscopic SV harvesting to open SV harvesting have demonstrated no significant difference in the incidence of RBC transfusions 46 or hematoma formation 47 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%