2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-0899-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective randomized trial comparing short-term antibiotic therapy versus standard therapy for acute uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis

Abstract: The results obtained with short-term ertapenem therapy (4 days) showed that this was as effective as standard therapy (7 days) for treatment of uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
36
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A controlled randomized study with 123 patients showed no differences between 4- and 7-day intravenous (ertapenem) antibiotic therapy in the duration of hospitalization and the clinical success rate [80]. …”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A controlled randomized study with 123 patients showed no differences between 4- and 7-day intravenous (ertapenem) antibiotic therapy in the duration of hospitalization and the clinical success rate [80]. …”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(24). Further, ertapenem covers most of the common microbial spectrum found in intra-abdominal infections with peritonitis (25,26). However, the free ertapenem concentration in the subcutaneous tissue and peritoneal fluid of morbidly obese patients has not yet been characterized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vons et al chose to administer amoxicillin and clavulinic acid to the antibiotic group. The decision was based on the findings of an earlier study, which proved that this combination is superior to other antibiotics when used in uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis [32]. However, it is worth noting that E. coli's resistance to amoxicillin and clavulinic acid has been increasing over the past few years [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%