2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective, randomized study comparing highly purified urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and recombinant FSH for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 61 studies that reported clinical pregnancy. There was moderate‐quality evidence, from 13 studies involving 1551 women, that showed no significant difference in using antagonist or agonist protocols for ovarian stimulation (RR = 1.02 (95% CI, 0.91–1.15), I 2 = 7%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We identified 61 studies that reported clinical pregnancy. There was moderate‐quality evidence, from 13 studies involving 1551 women, that showed no significant difference in using antagonist or agonist protocols for ovarian stimulation (RR = 1.02 (95% CI, 0.91–1.15), I 2 = 7%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified 41 studies that reported on OHSS. Low‐quality evidence suggested that antagonist protocols are associated with a lower risk for developing OHSS than are agonist protocols.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies, rFSH is more effective than uFSH in terms of number of retrieved oocytes, number of obtained embryos [ 12 ] and pregnancy rates [ 13 ]. Other studies revealed significantly higher fertilization rates and a higher number of good quality embryos when using uFSH with respect to rFSH [ 14 , 15 ]; while other data showed no significantly detectable differences in terms of number and quality of oocytes and pregnancy rates between rFSH and uFSH formulations [ 14 , 16 ]. Similarly, no significant differences were reported in terms of fertilization and pregnancy rates between uFSH and hMG [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of urinary FSH (uFSH), recombinant FSH (rFSH) and hMG formulations: although in the literature there are several studies comparing these different stimulation protocols, no unanimous results have been reported about the best one [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Hence, in this study, we aimed to couple the traditional markers of IVF success to data obtained by biomolecular and spectral analyses to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of advantages of this product over rFSH preparations have been reported, including: significantly more top-quality embryos [26]; consumption of significantly fewer units of FSH in patients older than 39, achieving equivalent embryo development and pregnancy rates [27]; significantly higher implantation and pregnancy rates when Fostimon was administered for the first 6 days, followed by rFSH, compared to rFSH alone [28]; significantly less FSH consumption in patients achieving blastocyst transfers on day 5 [29]; and a significantly higher number of top quality embryos and transferring of cryopreserved embryos in PCO-patients [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%