Prospective Randomized Comparative Evaluation of Proximal Valve Polyurethane and Distal Valve Silicone Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters

Ong, Cheng Kang; Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.; Lau, Gabriel B.; Wang, Shih C.

doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.020

Cited by 40 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hoffer et al showed that the incidence of infection was 50 % greater in the clamped catheter group (p = 0.02) than in the valved catheter group [20], whereas Ong et al noted a significantly higher incidence of catheter-related infection (6.2 vs. 2 %, p = 0.04) in the distal valve PICCs than in the proximal valve ones [21]. In these studies, there were as many valved as clamped devices, whereas we inserted mostly (60 %) clamped PICCs, which could explain that we did not find a significant difference between the devices.…”

Section: Microbiologymentioning

confidence: 97%

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Infections in a Cohort of Hospitalized Adult Patients

Bouzad

Duron²,

Bousquet

et al. 2015

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Microbiologymentioning

confidence: 97%

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Infections in a Cohort of Hospitalized Adult Patients

Bouzad

Duron²,

Bousquet

et al. 2015

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies showed a range of 42 to 82.4% of PICC insertions in the right side of the body (10)(11) . There is similarity in veins of the upper limb on both right and left side from the hands through to the subclavian veins.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A prospective, randomized study of post-insertions complications, comparing occurrences in proximal valve polyurethane PICC and distal valve silicone PICC, analyzed 392 catheters and their findings showed no association between complications and the vein used (p = 0.35) or body side (p = 0.24) (10) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Causas de remocao nao eletiva do cateter epicutaneo em neonatos

Paiva

Costa

Kimura

et al. 2013

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMOObjetivou-se descrever a incidência e as razões de remoção não eletiva do cateter epicutâneo em neonatos, verificando a associação com o sítio de inserção. Estudo de coorte prospectivo realizado em unidade de cuidado intensivo neonatal de um hospital privado terciário na cidade de São Paulo. Foram analisadas 266 inserções de cateter epicutâneo. A incidência de remoção não eletiva foi 39,1%. As complicações pós-inserção mais frequentes foram suspeita de infecção de corrente sanguínea relacionada ao cateter (25%) e ruptura (23,1%). A maioria dos cateteres foi inserida através do hemisfério corporal direito (65%), membros superiores (77,1%) e veias axilares (31,2%). Os resultados sugerem não haver associação entre a incidência de remoção não eletiva e o sítio de inserção do cateter epicutâneo em neonatos. Compete à Enfermagem implementar estratégias para a melhoria da prática assistencial a fim de diminuir a frequência de remoções não eletivas do cateter epicutâneo em neonatos. DESCRITORES Recém-nascido Cateterismo venoso central Enfermagem neonatal ABSTRACTThis study aimed to describe the incidence and reasons for nonelective removal of epicutaneous catheters in neonates, identifying its association with the catheter insertion site. This was a prospective cohort study, conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit of a private tertiary hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. We analyzed 266 epicutaneous catheter insertions. The incidence of non-elective removal was 39.1%. The most frequent post-insertion complications were suspicion of catheterrelated bloodstream infection (25%) and rupture (23.1%). Most catheters were inserted through the right side of the body (65%), in upper limbs (77.1%), and using the axillary veins (31.2%). The findings did not suggest association between the incidence of non-elective removal and the insertion site of the epicutaneous catheter in neonates. Nurses should implement strategies to improve care and decrease incidence of non-elective epicutaneous catheter removals among neonates. DESCRIPTORS Infant, newborn Catheterization central venous Neonatal nursing RESUMENEl objetivo fue describir la incidencia y las razones del retiro no electivo del catéter epicutáneo en neonatos, verificando la asociación con el sitio de inserción. Estudio de cohorte prospectiva conducido en una unidad de cuidados intensivos neonatales de un hospital privado terciario, en la ciudad de São Paulo, Brasil. Fueron analizados 266 inserciones de catéteres. La incidencia de retiro no electivo del catéter epicutáneo fue de 39,1%. Las complicaciones post-inserción más frecuentes fueron la sospecha de infección del torrente sanguíneo relacionada al catéter (25%) y ruptura (23,1%). La mayoría de los catéteres fueron insertados en el hemisferio corporal derecho (65%), en la extremidad superior (77,1%) y en la vena axilar (31,2%). Los resultados sugieren no haber asociación entre el sitio de inserción del catéter y la incidencia del retiro no electivo. Es de competencia de Enfermería implementar estrategias par...

show abstract

“…Elle permet l'aspiration, la perfusion et le maintien d'une pression positive. Cette valve favoriserait des rinçages plus efficaces [4]. La technique de pose est différente selon la valve.…”

Section: Définition -Matérielunclassified

“…Le choix du dispositif lors de la pose d'un accès veineux central doit être discuté en fonction de l'indication, de la durée d'utilisation et du patient [4,22]. L'équipe de Hopkins a proposé en 2003 une check-list pour contrôler les infections sur cathéter veineux central en réanimation.…”

Section: Place Du Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (Picc) Parmi Lunclassified

Le PICC line, une nouvelle stratégie dans l’accès veineux

Levigoureux

Charbonnel

Latour

et al. 2013

Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prospective Randomized Comparative Evaluation of Proximal Valve Polyurethane and Distal Valve Silicone Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters

Cited by 40 publications

References 23 publications

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Infections in a Cohort of Hospitalized Adult Patients

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Infections in a Cohort of Hospitalized Adult Patients

Causas de remocao nao eletiva do cateter epicutaneo em neonatos

Le PICC line, une nouvelle stratégie dans l’accès veineux

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About