Prospective randomized clinical trial of Jean Rives technique versus laparoscopic TEP repair for primary inguinal hernia: 10-year follow-up

Tomaoglu, Kamer; Sarı, Yavuz Selim; Bektaş, Hasan; Koc, Oguz; Güneş, Elif Öksüz; Uzum, Gungor; Küçükyılmaz, Meltem

doi:10.1007/s10029-015-1350-0

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sixty‐seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies had the same participants with different durations of follow‐up, resulting in 58 RCTs with unique populations ( Fig . ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twenty‐one studies (36 per cent) reported pain as an outcome after 1 year, with 4481 patients randomized in the open repair group and 4290 in the laparoscopic repair group.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twenty‐nine studies (50 per cent) reported time taken to return to work; 5543 patients were randomized in the open repair group and 5118 in the laparoscopic repair group. The crude mean time to return to work was 10·9 (range 2–27) days after laparoscopic repair and 16·8 (5–27) days after open repair.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair

Patterson

Beck

Currie

et al. 2019

British Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Inguinal hernia repair is a common low-risk intervention. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are being used increasingly as primary outcomes in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to review and meta-analyse the PROs in RCTs comparing laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair techniques in adult patients.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Only RCTs in peer-reviewed journals were considered. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched. In addition, four trial registries were searched. The search interval was between 1 January 1998 and 1 May 2018. Identified publications were reviewed independently by two authors. The review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018099552). Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool.Results: Some 7192 records were identified, from which 58 unique RCTs were selected. Laparoscopic hernia repair was associated with significantly less postoperative pain in three intervals: from 2 weeks to within 6 months after surgery (risk ratio (RR) 0⋅74, 95 per cent c.i. 0⋅62 to 0⋅88), 6 months to 1 year (RR 0⋅74, 0⋅59 to 0⋅93) and 1 year onwards (RR 0⋅62, 0⋅47 to 0⋅82). Paraesthesia (RR 0⋅27, 0⋅18 to 0⋅40) and patient-reported satisfaction (RR 0⋅91, 0⋅85 to 0⋅98) were also significantly better in the laparoscopic repair group. Conclusion:The data and analysis reported in this study reflect the most up-to-date evidence available for the surgeon to counsel patients. It was constrained by heterogeneity of reporting for several outcomes. Summary measures and synthesis of resultsPROs are shown as crude rates and, if appropriate, mean scores. Meta-analysisMeta-analysis was undertaken for each distinct outcome if there were two or more RCTs that examined the same

show abstract

“…Sixty‐seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies had the same participants with different durations of follow‐up, resulting in 58 RCTs with unique populations ( Fig . ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twenty‐one studies (36 per cent) reported pain as an outcome after 1 year, with 4481 patients randomized in the open repair group and 4290 in the laparoscopic repair group.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair

Patterson

Beck

Currie

et al. 2019

British Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the basis of these data, realistic recurrence rates can be calculated after surgical repair of inguinal and incisional hernia. This is useful since the majority of published studies on hernia surgery only have a follow-up period of 1–5 years (2), and studies with a 10-year follow-up are an absolute exception (3–7). As a consequence of our own data, we will extend the follow-up of the patients with inguinal hernia repair in the Herniamed Registry to a minimum of 20 years.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is known that recurrence continues to occur after the follow-up period of 1–5 years usually used in most hernia studies (2). There are relatively few studies that have calculated the recurrence rates following inguinal and incisional hernia operations after a follow-up of 10 years (3–7). To date, there are no studies on recurrences after a follow-up of more than 10 years.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Long Do We Need to Follow-Up Our Hernia Patients to Find the Real Recurrence Rate?

Köckerling

Koch

Lorenz³

et al. 2015

Front. Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionIt is known that recurrences continue to occur after the follow-up period of 1–5 years usually used in most hernia studies. By reviewing the data in the Herniamed Hernia Registry documenting the time interval between the recurrent operation and previous inguinal hernia repair, the present study identifies the temporal course of onset of recurrence.Patients and MethodsProspective data were recorded in the Herniamed Registry between 1 September 2009 and 4 May 2015 on a total of 145,590 patients with 171,143 inguinal hernia operations. These included 18,774 operations due to an inguinal hernia recurrence (10.94%). During the same period, prospective data were collected on 24,385 incisional hernia operations. The latter cases included 5,328 patients with a recurrent incisional hernia (21.85%).ResultsOnly 57.46% of all inguinal hernia recurrences occurred within 10 years of the previous inguinal hernia operation. Some of the remaining 42.54% of all recurrences occurred only much later, even after more than 50 years. The course of onset of recurrence is markedly different for incisional hernia. About 91.87% of such recurrences occur already within 10 years of the last operation.ConclusionAscertainment of the actual recurrence rate after hernia repair calls for a follow-up of 10 years for incisional hernia and of 50 years for inguinal hernia. The data collected can be used to give an approximate estimate with a shorter follow-up.

show abstract

Femoralhernienreparation nach Rives (Rives-Femoral)

Dietz

Wiegering

2021

Offene Hernienchirurgie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prospective randomized clinical trial of Jean Rives technique versus laparoscopic TEP repair for primary inguinal hernia: 10-year follow-up

Abstract: Jean Rives technique is a relatively easy technique to perform, requires shorter operating time when compared to laparoscopic TEP technique. JR technique should be taken into consideration while planning surgical treatment of inguinal hernia.

Cited by 6 publications

References 15 publications

Meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair

Meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair

How Long Do We Need to Follow-Up Our Hernia Patients to Find the Real Recurrence Rate?

Femoralhernienreparation nach Rives (Rives-Femoral)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About