The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Povidone-Iodine 1.25% Solution Versus Topical Antibiotics for Treatment of Bacterial Keratitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emerging resistance to many commercially available antibiotics makes the use of PVP‐I in ophthalmic solution an interesting, potential alternative for the treatment of bacterial infections of the ocular surface, especially in resource‐poor areas of the world, where new drugs to which these organisms may be susceptible will not be widely available (Isenberg et al. ). Indeed, Isenberg et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Emerging resistance to many commercially available antibiotics makes the use of PVP‐I in ophthalmic solution an interesting, potential alternative for the treatment of bacterial infections of the ocular surface, especially in resource‐poor areas of the world, where new drugs to which these organisms may be susceptible will not be widely available (Isenberg et al. ). Indeed, Isenberg et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Isenberg et al. () have recently shown that there was no significant difference between the effect of topical PVP‐I 1.25% and commercial topical antibiotics for treatment of bacterial keratitis in developing countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They can be used as adjunct therapy to treat difficult to eradicate infections, to reduce the duration of antibiotic use, and as primary treatment of infection. 7,10,11 Additionally, compared with antibiotics, PI 1.25% use has been recently reported to be noninferior as a treatment for bacterial keratitis. 7 The low cost, wide availability, and simple preparation of PI may make it useful as a primary therapy in resource-limited settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Isenberg et al recently reported using PI 1.25% as a treatment for bacterial keratitis. 7 The efficacy of variable concentrations of PI on pathologic ocular surface isolates has not, to our knowledge, been reported previously, despite the fact that concentration and frequency of use in treatment studies could affect outcomes and the perceived viability of PI in applications beyond surgical site prophylaxis. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the killing time of various concentrations of PI using clinical isolates from corneal ulcers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%