Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy

Abstract

Purpose and Objectives Our department has a long-established comprehensive quality assurance (QA) planning clinic for patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. Our aim is to assess the impact of a real-time peer review QA process on the quantitative and qualitative radiation therapy plan changes in the era of intensity modulated RT (IMRT). Methods and Materials Prospective data for 85 patients undergoing head and neck IMRT who presented at a biweekly QA clinic after simulation and contouring were collected. A standard data collection form was used to document alterations made during this process. The original pre-QA clinical target volumes (CTVs) approved by the treating-attending physicians were saved before QA and compared with post-QA consensus CTVs. Qualitative assessment was done according to predefined criteria. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) and other volume overlap metrics were calculated for each CTV level and were used for quantitative comparison. Changes are categorized as major, minor, and trivial according to the degree of overlap. Patterns of failure were analyzed and correlated to plan changes. Results All 85 patients were examined by at least 1 head and neck subspecialist radiation oncologist who was not the treating-attending physician; 80 (94%) were examined by ≥3 faculty members. New clinical findings on physical examination were found in 12 patients (14%) leading to major plan changes. Quantitative DSC analysis revealed significantly better agreement in CTV1 (0.94 ± 0.10) contours that in CTV2 (0.82 ± 0.25) and CTV3 (0.86 ± 0.2) contours (P=.0002 and P=.03, respectively; matched-pair Wil-coxon test). The experience of the treating-attending radiation oncologist significantly affected DSC values when all CTV levels were considered (P=.012; matched-pair Wil-coxon text). After a median follow-up time of 38 months, only 10 patients (12%) had local recurrence, regional recurrence, or both, mostly in central high-dose areas. Conclusions Comprehensive peer review planning clinic is an essential component of IMRT QA that led to major changes in one third of the study population. This process ensured safety related to target definition and led to favorable disease control profiles, with no identifiable recurrences attributable to geometric misses or delineation errors.

Head and neck cancer patient images for determining auto‐segmentation accuracy in T2‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging through expert manual segmentations

“…Lastly, while head and neck cancers are most common on male patients, we found that approximately 90% of cases in this dataset were male. This proportion of male patients is slightly higher than our previous report of approximately 75% of patients treated at our clinic for head and neck cancers.…”

Differences between planned and delivered dose for head and neck cancer, and their consequences for normal tissue complication probability and treatment adaptation

“…All plans were 9 beam step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy plans in adherence to the RTOG treatment guidelines. They were peerreviewed [8][9][10]. For daily position verification, the patient was aligned to treatment position using skin marks on the linear accelerator, then the table turned 180 degrees and CToR scan was made in treatment position.…”

Patterns-of-failure guided biological target volume definition for head and neck cancer patients: FDG-PET and dosimetric analysis of dose escalation candidate subregions

“…TV definition was done in the Pinnacle treatment planning system (Pinnacle, Phillips Medical Systems, Andover, MA), with rigorous multi-physician quality assurance. [18]…”