1986
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.41.1.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective payment and psychological services: What difference does it make? Psychologists aren't in Medicare anyway!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation applies for psychological services of all sorts, including traditional psychotherapeutic services provided for individuals with mental health diagnoses (termed here for clarity mental health services , as they are within the Medicare program) as well as the behavioral medicine services in which psychologists are increasingly engaged. Yet many psychologists assume a passive stance toward the Medicare program, deeming it incomprehensible, unchangeable, and uninterested in psychological services (Uyeda & Moldawsky, 1986). In this article, we argue that Medicare need be none of these things, and we offer policy analysis, a case example, and a well-known model of public policy change (Kingdon, 1995) that can help psychologists understand and influence Medicare coverage decisions and the broader federal policy network in which coverage decisions are made.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation applies for psychological services of all sorts, including traditional psychotherapeutic services provided for individuals with mental health diagnoses (termed here for clarity mental health services , as they are within the Medicare program) as well as the behavioral medicine services in which psychologists are increasingly engaged. Yet many psychologists assume a passive stance toward the Medicare program, deeming it incomprehensible, unchangeable, and uninterested in psychological services (Uyeda & Moldawsky, 1986). In this article, we argue that Medicare need be none of these things, and we offer policy analysis, a case example, and a well-known model of public policy change (Kingdon, 1995) that can help psychologists understand and influence Medicare coverage decisions and the broader federal policy network in which coverage decisions are made.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is true for general hospitals is not presently true for psychiatric hospitals, although it could be the handwriting on the wall for psychiatric institutions. To date, psychiatric hospitals have been exempted from DRGs for a variety of reasons (Uyeda & Moldawsky, 1986). One of the reasons is that the mental health organizations, including the American Psychological As-sociation and the American Psychiatric Association, have vigorously opposed the prospective payment plan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It goes without saying that inpatient treatment is by far the most expensive mode of mental health care. For instance, all Medicare hospital costs have increased an average of 19.2% per year (Uyeda & Moldawsky, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the average stay of such patients with a given diagnosis has tended to be longer than similarly diagnosed patients in a private-sector hospital (Jacobs & Date, 1986). These are the very kinds of patients for whom psychological services would be most indicated (Errera, 1985), yet the press toward reducing costs of in-hospital services, coupled with the drive to cut lengths of stay, has made it difficult for psychologists to justify their cost as members of or consultants to an inpatient team (Uyeda & Moldawsky, 1986). Moreover, intensified preadmission screening and greater use of residential alternatives to hospitalization have significantly changed the nature of patients entering hospital wards, so that today they are much more acutely ill than their predecessors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%