2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.08.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective observational case series evaluating middle ear fluid and tympanostomy tubes through pyrosequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to anaerobic infections of the sinuses and head and neck tissues, the presence of Porphyromonas or Fusobacterium is likely due to seeding of necrotic or damaged tissue by anaerobic bacterial pathogens after failure of antibiotic treatment ( Brook, 2011 ). These anaerobes may also facilitate biofilm formation ( Wang et al., 2018 ). Identification of these bacteria in cholesteatoma samples that may not be reached by and/or are resistant to the usual otic drops suggest an important opportunity to administer intravenous or oral antibiotics with proper bacterial coverage (e.g., clindamycin, metronidazole, chloramphenicol) immediately after cholesteatoma removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to anaerobic infections of the sinuses and head and neck tissues, the presence of Porphyromonas or Fusobacterium is likely due to seeding of necrotic or damaged tissue by anaerobic bacterial pathogens after failure of antibiotic treatment ( Brook, 2011 ). These anaerobes may also facilitate biofilm formation ( Wang et al., 2018 ). Identification of these bacteria in cholesteatoma samples that may not be reached by and/or are resistant to the usual otic drops suggest an important opportunity to administer intravenous or oral antibiotics with proper bacterial coverage (e.g., clindamycin, metronidazole, chloramphenicol) immediately after cholesteatoma removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, care must be taken when comparing data from studies that targeted different regions of the 16S rRNA gene. To date, the V1-3 [7,17], V3-4 [4,9,18], V4 [2,11,19,20] and V5-6 [21] regions have all been used in OM studies. A further limitation is that short-read 16S rRNA gene sequences may only provide sufficient taxonomic resolution for bacterial identification to the family or genus-level.…”
Section: Important Limits In the Recent Om Microbiome Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure to address this issue can lead to false conclusions, as recently reported in placental microbiome studies [26]. Despite the risk, bacterial load is often not reported in OM microbiome studies [2,4,5,9,17,19,20]. Among studies that have considered bacterial load limitations, there is heterogeneity in the quantification methods; inclusion, sequencing and reporting of negative controls; and the analytic methods used to identify potential contaminants [7,9,11,18,21].…”
Section: Important Limits In the Recent Om Microbiome Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability is explained by the differences in study design and time from beginning of symptoms to time of swabbing and method of culture processing (standard cultures, polymerase chain reaction or DNA pyrosequencing analysis). 8 Studies using conventional microbiological cultures showed that Haemophilus influenzae , Staphylococcus aureus , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common microorganisms isolated in untreated, uncomplicated PTTO cases. Because S aureus and P aeruginosa are normal inhabitants of external auditory canal, their detection in samples from this site does not imply a pathogenic role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%