2017
DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.17.02845-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the index lesion was defined as the lesion with the largest volume at pathology (12). As far as mpMRI detection of high GS tumor, literature data confirm that MRI is accurate in the identification of high Gleason pattern PCa (8)(9)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In the present study, the index lesion was defined as the lesion with the largest volume at pathology (12). As far as mpMRI detection of high GS tumor, literature data confirm that MRI is accurate in the identification of high Gleason pattern PCa (8)(9)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…A change has been made to the target population definition as follows: "Patients with an elevated risk of csPCa (defined as International -In total, 16 cohort studies and the two RCTs mentioned above presented detection rates comparing mpMRI-TB to TRUS-SB. 7,9,11,12,14,16,[22][23][24][31][32][33]40,[42][43][44] Estimates for csPCa showed increased detection favoring mpMRI-TB by 3% (95% CI 0-7, p=0.03).…”
Section: Main Comments Responsesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Twenty-three trials (all full-text publications) compared mpMRI with a reference standard (n=5, all cohort studies) or with TRUS-SB (n=18: 2 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 16 cohort studies) for biopsy-naive men. The certainty of the aggregate study evidence for each comparison showed 14 of the 21 cohort studies to be at either low 6,32,40 or moderate 7,9,11,2,14,16,18,22,25,33,44 risk of bias based on a GRADE approach. 48 One of the RCTs was assessed to be at low risks of bias 20 and the other was assessed at being at unclear risk.…”
Section: Key Evidence For Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation