2022
DOI: 10.3390/make4040046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Neural Network Model for Seismic Precursory Signal Detection in Geomagnetic Field Records

Abstract: We designed a convolutional neural network application to detect seismic precursors in geomagnetic field records. Earthquakes are among the most destructive natural hazards on Earth, yet their short-term forecasting has not been achieved. Stress loading in dry rocks can generate electric currents that cause short-term changes to the geomagnetic field, yielding theoretically detectable pre-earthquake electromagnetic emissions. We propose a CNN model that scans windows of geomagnetic data streams and self-update… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods using multidisciplinary precursors [82] or AI approaches to learn the relevant signals (see, e.g., [83]) have been promoted. These procedures, which can be valuable in EQ prediction, may use the present pulse shapes based on the cracks' features as guiding elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods using multidisciplinary precursors [82] or AI approaches to learn the relevant signals (see, e.g., [83]) have been promoted. These procedures, which can be valuable in EQ prediction, may use the present pulse shapes based on the cracks' features as guiding elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, there have been a lot of machine-learning applications to find ionospheric precursors from TEC data (e.g., [89] [90] [91] [92]). In the field of geomagnetic data, Petrescu and Moldovan (2022) [93] have proposed a prospective neural network model for seismic precursory signal detection in geomagnetic field records. The algorithm does not take into account the physics behind the production of signals, but only picks up repeated features associated with the imposed labels.…”
Section: Future Direction Of Ulf Emissions As a Reliable Diagnostic Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%