2013
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective motion correction using inductively coupled wireless RF coils

Abstract: Purpose A novel prospective motion correction technique for brain MRI is presented that uses miniature wireless radio-frequency (RF) coils, or “wireless markers”, for position tracking. Methods Each marker is free of traditional cable connections to the scanner. Instead, its signal is wirelessly linked to the MR receiver via inductive coupling with the head coil. Real-time tracking of rigid head motion is performed using a pair of glasses integrated with three wireless markers. A tracking pulse-sequence, com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the accuracy of the navigation sequence, and to reduce interference with the imaging process, it is possible to use additional spatial-frequency-tuned markers (77), miniature radio-frequency probes (78, 79), or signals of the endogenous fat (80, 81). However, many of these methods were so far restricted to 1D (80) and 2D (77, 81), and are generally only used in research applications.…”
Section: Artefact Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To improve the accuracy of the navigation sequence, and to reduce interference with the imaging process, it is possible to use additional spatial-frequency-tuned markers (77), miniature radio-frequency probes (78, 79), or signals of the endogenous fat (80, 81). However, many of these methods were so far restricted to 1D (80) and 2D (77, 81), and are generally only used in research applications.…”
Section: Artefact Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cloverleaf, spherical or orbital navigators (66, 67, 73)). Alternatively, an external tracking device can be used, including stereo camera systems (95), miniature RF probes (78, 79, 96), in-bore camera systems (97-99), or ultrasound systems (100). Navigators need to be compatible with the sequence timing and typically have a low temporal sample rate.…”
Section: Artefact Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches use additional devices, e.g. MR-visible markers (Ooi et al, 2013a, 2011; Sengupta et al, 2014), where the detected motion is still in MR reference frame, but rigid coupling between the markers and the object is not necessarily present and additional measures need to be taken in order to ensure such coupling. Finally, for truly external motion tracking devices (Forman et al, 2010; Maclaren et al, 2012; Rotenberg et al, 2013; Schulz et al, 2012; Zaitsev et al, 2006), both marker fixation and coordinate frame matching need to be ensured.…”
Section: Common Pitfalls Associated With Prospective Motion Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid navigator approach combines a set of extrinsic fiducial markers with a simple rapidly acquired navigator that locates the markers and estimates the position and orientation of the set. Markers may consist of miniature coils activated by the scanner RF pulses (Muraskin et al, 2013;Ooi, Aksoy, Maclaren, Watkins, & Bammer, 2013;Thormer et al, 2012). These methods are more difficult to apply in the clinical situation due to the additional hardware, calibration, and markers affixed to the patient.…”
Section: Motion Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%