2007
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective follow-up of a novel design haemodialysis catheter; lower infection rates and improved survival

Abstract: Background. Untunnelled straight jugular catheters (USC) are uncomfortable for patients and cannot be well fixated. This could be a reason for the high incidence of catheterrelated complications. Methods. We prospectively analysed the outcome of a novel designed untunnelled precurved catheter (UPC) with better fixation properties and compared it with the outcome of USC. The outcome was also related to data on tunnelled cuffed catheters (TCC). Results. The outcome of USC was documented over a 32-month period. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Newly designed non‐tunneled precurved jugular catheters, introduced some years ago, were comparable to tunneled, or were even better, in terms of incidence of exit site infections and bacteremias. Excellent results were also observed in our precurved catheters: only 0.2 exit site infections and 0.2 bacteremias per 1000 catheter days confirmed excellent results observed by others in precurved catheters (4). Our bacteremia rate was much lower even when compared to tunneled cuffed catheters (1.6–5.5 bacteremias/1000 catheter days) (15–17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Newly designed non‐tunneled precurved jugular catheters, introduced some years ago, were comparable to tunneled, or were even better, in terms of incidence of exit site infections and bacteremias. Excellent results were also observed in our precurved catheters: only 0.2 exit site infections and 0.2 bacteremias per 1000 catheter days confirmed excellent results observed by others in precurved catheters (4). Our bacteremia rate was much lower even when compared to tunneled cuffed catheters (1.6–5.5 bacteremias/1000 catheter days) (15–17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…New design of precurved jugular catheters, which are bent over the clavicle and fixed to the chest wall, reduced the movement of the catheter at the exit site, thus reducing microinjury of the adjacent tissue and consequently improving resistance of the tissue against infection (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Caylan et al 20 the position of temporary catheters in femoral vein creates 2.14 times bigger risk for catheter-related infections occurrence. However, the results of recent studies do not link the insertion spot of temporary and permanent catheters to a higher risk of infections [36][37][38] .…”
Section: Avf -Arteriovenous Fistula; Avg-arteriovenous Graft; а Permamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NKF‐K/DOQI) limited the use of ‘temporary’ catheters to less than a week, clinical practice has taught us that catheters could have been used for much longer periods of time, even for several months or years, without serious complications, usually comparable to those in tunneled, silastic, atrial (permanent) HD catheters. Newly designed, precurved, jugular ‘temporary’ catheters became comparable to the tunneled, cuffed, silastic ones: 1.8 bacteremia/1000 catheter days and 11 exit site infections in silastic tunneled catheters and no bacteremias, and only one exit site infection in precurved jugular catheters (4).…”
Section: Catheters As Temporary Vascular Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%