36he surgical repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) includes vaginal and abdominal approaches. 1 The vaginal approaches are lessmorbid than abdominal approaches.However, abdominal approaches provides lower recurrence rates and less dysparenuia than vaginal approaches.2 Today, sacrocolpopexy is the gold standard procedure for apical POP repair.1,2 The procedure that can be performed by abdominally (ASC), or minimally invasively (MISC), provides excellent anatomical and functional outcomes. Since vaginal vault prolapses occured more rarely, the number of studies including MISCs are rare.3 Herein we report our experience with abdominal and minimally invasive approaches of the sacrocolpopexy. In addition, we present the demographic, peri-and postoperative outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive approaches. Within the MISC group, 17 were laparoscopic (LSC) and 3 were robotic (RSC). The patients were presented with vaginal mass in 40 and bilateral lombar pain in 1. Statistical analyses were done using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test with SPSS version 15.0. R Re es su ul lt ts s: : The mean follow-up time was 61.3 (11-90) months. Mean estimated blood loss and length of hospitalization were significantly longer for ASC (p<0.001), whereas the operative time was significantly shorter (p<0.001). Recurrence was seen in 1 patient after MISC and repaired with ASC. Grade 2 prolapsus was seen in 4 at follow-up, however vaginal erosion was not. The success rates were; 90.0% for MISC and 90.4% for ASC. C Co on nc cl lu us si io on n: : MISC led to shorter hospitalization, better hemostasis than ASC. MISC is as effective as ASC for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Further prospective and randomized controlled studies including large series of patients are needed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
SUBJECTS