Prospective Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction, and Surgeon and Patient Trainer Assessment of the Coloplast Titan One Touch Release Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
Abstract:The Titan OTR represents an advance in penile prosthetic technology that is well accepted by patients and physicians. The study design allowed for realistic evaluation of the new technology aimed at enhancing clinical outcomes.
“…However, other studies which included such patients have uniformly found satisfaction rates of about 80-95% with the three-piece implant [6,10,[13][14][15][16][17][18]. In addition, patients' satisfaction with penile implants has been shown to be greater than for other ED treatments, with satisfaction rates of 91% for implants compared to 45% for PDE5 inhibitors and 36% for injection therapy in one study [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In recent years, the introduction of local antibacterial measures with hydrophilic and/or antibiotic coated implants has lowered infection rates to about 3% [4,10]. Precautions during surgery, including washing and careful disinfection of the surgical area, as well as reduced traffic within the operating room, are likely to have contributed to the improvements.…”
Although it is important to inform patients about potential problems such as infection, pain and mechanical failure, the results show that inflatable penile implants are a good treatment choice for erectile dysfunction when conservative measures have failed.
“…However, other studies which included such patients have uniformly found satisfaction rates of about 80-95% with the three-piece implant [6,10,[13][14][15][16][17][18]. In addition, patients' satisfaction with penile implants has been shown to be greater than for other ED treatments, with satisfaction rates of 91% for implants compared to 45% for PDE5 inhibitors and 36% for injection therapy in one study [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In recent years, the introduction of local antibacterial measures with hydrophilic and/or antibiotic coated implants has lowered infection rates to about 3% [4,10]. Precautions during surgery, including washing and careful disinfection of the surgical area, as well as reduced traffic within the operating room, are likely to have contributed to the improvements.…”
Although it is important to inform patients about potential problems such as infection, pain and mechanical failure, the results show that inflatable penile implants are a good treatment choice for erectile dysfunction when conservative measures have failed.
“…It is estimated that over 50% of men between the ages of 40 and 70 suffer from ED to some degree 12. Over a decade ago, the introduction of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5 inhibitors) aided and substantially improved ED treatment 3. Despite its effectiveness being high and estimated at around 60%-70%,4 other more invasive therapies may still be required, such as alprostadil treatment via intraurethral route or intracavernous injections, and vacuum devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been numerous studies published until now which evaluated each type of prosthesis independently as regards the satisfaction of the patient, the partner and the surgeon. Similarly, studies have been conducted to assess both types of prostheses independently in very specific scenarios such as to evaluate new developments and technical advances of each of the prostheses, or to compare their effectiveness in special clinical situations such as for concomitant DE and Peyronie's disease treatment 379101112…”
Most widespread three-component penile prosthesis models are 700CX™ and Titan®. Our purpose is to assess patient and partner satisfaction after the first implant. This is a multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized study in which all patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2013 were included. In total, 248 patients agreed to participate. To evaluate patient satisfaction, a validated but modified 11-question questionnaire was completed (EDITS); and a nonvalidated two-item questionnaire was given to the partner. Statistical analysis used an ordinal logistic regression model. Two hundred and forty-eight patients (194 with 700CX™
vs 54 with Titan®) and 207 couples completed the questionnaire (165 with 700CX™
vs 42 with Titan®). Overall satisfaction was high. Both showed great reliability for sexual intercourse and high compliance with prior expectations. Most patients were able to manage the penile prosthesis correctly within 6 months. Postoperative penile shortening led to some dissatisfaction in 42% and 46% of cases (700CX™ /Titan®). Significant differences were found in three questions of patients’ questionnaire. There were more patients satisfied with the 700CX™ (P = 0.0001). No patient with Titan® implant took longer than 6 months to optimal management. Only 4% of patients with 700CX™ implant were dissatisfied with the deflation, in contrast to 24% with the Titan® (P = 0.0031). Of the two partners’ questions, one showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0026). It seems that group 700CX™ would recommend to re-implant the prosthesis with a greater tendency. The overall satisfaction was very high for both prostheses. The final aspect of the erected and flaccid penis was satisfactory, but both groups showed significant discontent with its final size. Partners’ overall satisfaction was high.
“…Ease of deflation was improved compared with historical data. 4 A Danish study revealed that 1 of 33 patients (3%) with an OTR pump implant had to undergo revision surgery for a deflation problem. 5 An 85% overall satisfaction rate was noted.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.