Abstract:Diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis remains insufficient, with an unacceptable high rate of unnecessary operations. Only the promotion of routine ultrasonography might contribute to an improvement in the near future.
“…Our rate of negative appendicectomy (15%) was well within the range of the performance criteria for the clinical diagnosis of AA suggested by several authors [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. On the other hand, the rate of perforations (6%) and the rate of wound infections (no cases in patients with simple appendicitis and three cases in the patients with perforation) were relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The appendicitis score performed with a similar accuracy as in our validation study in paediatric patients suspected for AA [10]; but in the control group, the surgeons were able to distinguish AA from other conditions with a relatively high accuracy compared to that reported earlier [12][13][14][15]. Thus, no difference between the two groups was obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Ultrasonography is not associated with ionising radiation and could, thus, be used without any apparent risk for the patients. Studies have shown that diagnostic US improves the diagnostic accuracy of suspected AA [15,24]. Several studies have evaluated the use of US among general surgeons and shown that the technique of diagnostic US is relatively easy to learn, and, thus, may increase the diagnostic accuracy also among physicians with less experience with US.…”
The use of the acute appendicitis score developed for paediatric patients seems to provide some benefits compared to an unaided clinical diagnosis and may, thus, be a useful diagnostic tool for general surgeons.
“…Our rate of negative appendicectomy (15%) was well within the range of the performance criteria for the clinical diagnosis of AA suggested by several authors [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. On the other hand, the rate of perforations (6%) and the rate of wound infections (no cases in patients with simple appendicitis and three cases in the patients with perforation) were relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The appendicitis score performed with a similar accuracy as in our validation study in paediatric patients suspected for AA [10]; but in the control group, the surgeons were able to distinguish AA from other conditions with a relatively high accuracy compared to that reported earlier [12][13][14][15]. Thus, no difference between the two groups was obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Ultrasonography is not associated with ionising radiation and could, thus, be used without any apparent risk for the patients. Studies have shown that diagnostic US improves the diagnostic accuracy of suspected AA [15,24]. Several studies have evaluated the use of US among general surgeons and shown that the technique of diagnostic US is relatively easy to learn, and, thus, may increase the diagnostic accuracy also among physicians with less experience with US.…”
The use of the acute appendicitis score developed for paediatric patients seems to provide some benefits compared to an unaided clinical diagnosis and may, thus, be a useful diagnostic tool for general surgeons.
“…Even ultrasound, the diagnostic tool with the highest specificity, positive predictive value, and highest accuracy to correctly diagnose acute appendicitis [20] fails in some cases. It is important to mention that six of the aforementioned nine patients had findings on ultrasound resembling acute appendicitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At the time of surgery, their unexpected findings might also have been overlooked if open surgery had been performed. As has already been published, an important factor for a correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis is the experienced surgeon [20]. This should always be completed by imaging modalities.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.