2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2889-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Comprehensive Swallowing Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomies with Cervical Anastomosis: Silent Versus Vocal Aspiration

Abstract: Swallowing dysfunction remains a common problem after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with cervical anastomosis and can be readily identified. Silent aspiration likely contributes to pneumonia after MIE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our study did not show any relation between hoarseness and a postoperative swallowing difficulty. In terms of the dissociation between swallowing function and clinical symptoms, a previous study has included many patients with silent aspiration who did not present with hoarseness, indicating that it may not be possible to predict swallowing difficulty on the basis of physical findings alone [7]. We believe that the results of our study support this conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, our study did not show any relation between hoarseness and a postoperative swallowing difficulty. In terms of the dissociation between swallowing function and clinical symptoms, a previous study has included many patients with silent aspiration who did not present with hoarseness, indicating that it may not be possible to predict swallowing difficulty on the basis of physical findings alone [7]. We believe that the results of our study support this conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Although this procedure has been accepted by thoracic surgeons as safe and with minimal side effects, the results of the analyses performed here indicate otherwise. Experience from other cervical surgeries and their impact on swallowing function is well known and documented [9, 10]. Problems with swallowing after these operations exist even in patients with intact recurrent nerve function at the end of the operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention that if the cervical anastomosis is too proximal, reaching up to the pharynx, the swallowing is more hesitant and associated with a higher risk of tracheobronchial aspiration. Also, the cervical anastomotic leak does not imply a vital prognosis, eventual healing with stenosis is treated with endoscopic dilations (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%