1995
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199509001-00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Comparison of Minimal Incision “Open” and Two-Portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Some patients do not work, while others may not intend to return to work for reasons other than disability from CTS. Other socioeconomic factors or workers' compensation state regulations may also influence return-to-work decisions.…”
Section: Outcomes Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Some patients do not work, while others may not intend to return to work for reasons other than disability from CTS. Other socioeconomic factors or workers' compensation state regulations may also influence return-to-work decisions.…”
Section: Outcomes Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the ineligible studies, 11 were excluded because they were not randomized (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33), four because they did not compare ECTR with OCTR (34-37) and two because RTW was not an outcome measure (38)(39).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discomfort in the palm is often the limiting factor in the patient's ability to resume normal activity and work. The endoscopic technique has demonstrated less pain than the traditional open method [2,6,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Despite these improved results with the endoscopic technique, patients still have some degree of palm pain after surgery limiting return to activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%