2001
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200110000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Comparison of Admission Computed Tomographic Scan and Plain Films of the Upper Cervical Spine in Trauma Patients with Altered Mental Status

Abstract: CT scan of Co-C3 was superior to plain films in the early identification of upper cervical spine injury. Plain films failed to identify 45% of upper cervical spine injuries; four of these missed injuries resulted in motor deficits. Our study supports the practice guidelines developed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma for clearance of the upper cervical spine in patients with altered mental status, as all patients with injuries were identified using these guidelines.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17,25,27,32,37,42,52 Reported rates of cervical spine injury concomitant with traumatic coma are between 6% and 9%. Lower rates have been cited in reports that detail less precisely the severity of the TBI and the methods of evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,25,27,32,37,42,52 Reported rates of cervical spine injury concomitant with traumatic coma are between 6% and 9%. Lower rates have been cited in reports that detail less precisely the severity of the TBI and the methods of evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routinely using CT may detect otherwise unsuspected non-cervical injuries in 7-9% of patients, e.g. fractured mandible, pneumothorax and base of skull fracture, all missed on plain films [13,105].…”
Section: Computerised Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…based upon the highest methodological quality prospective, randomised, controlled trials, but these guidelines are supported by a number of studies. Schenarts et al [13] prospectively recruited unevaluable trauma patients requiring CT of two or more body areas. Among 1356 patients, 70 (5.2%) patients suffered 95 upper cervical injuries.…”
Section: Computerised Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations