Prospective Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Totally Extra-Peritoneal Repair for Inguinal Hernia with Light Weight Polypropylene Mesh V/S 3D Anatomically Shaped Large Pore Polypropylene Mesh

Shah, Sundeep; Patel, Jekee B.; Vyas, Adhish V.; Aphale, Rijuta; Suthar, Nilkanth M.; Mistry, Reecha B.; Shah, Devyani S.

doi:10.1007/s12262-021-03108-2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ten trials included, three trials regarding 3d mesh versus conventional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were selected from electronic databases. 8,9,10 Three trials regarding 3d mesh and four trials regarding polyprolene mesh. 11,12,13,14,15,16,17 The search process is shown in table 3…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study Between Intra-Operative Difficulties and Postoperative Complications in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair using Conventional Polypropylene Mesh and 3D Mesh A Meta-Analysis

Hassan

Awad

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The fundamental mechanism of abdominal wall hernia formation is the loss of structural integrity at the musculotendinous layer. The idea of the Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is to repair the defect and put artificial/biological mesh. There is too many types of meshes differs from shape ,size and material of the mesh . Objective: To assess laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using two different meshes: The conventional polyprolene mesh and the three-dimensional (3D) mesh, as regard the operative application time and post-operative complications including seroma , chronic pain, ,and recurrence using meta-analysis approach. Patients and Methods: In our study ten trials included, three trials regarding 3d mesh versus conventional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair , three trials regarding 3d mesh and four trials regarding polyprolene mesh. Data Sources: Medline databases (PubMed, Medscape, ScienceDirect. EMF-Portal) and all materials available in the Internet till 2021. Results: There is significant heterogeneity among trials (P = 0.002, I2 = 84%), mean difference 1.17, 95% CI -2.18, 4.52 and there is no statistically significance z=0.49. Conclusion: There is no difference between conventional polyprolene and 3d mesh regarding intra-operative difficulties (operative time) and post-operative complications (chronic pain, recurrence, operative time and seroma).

show abstract