2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective assessment of trochanteric fracture managed by intramedullary nailing with controlled and limited blade back-out

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was explained by the difficulty of reducing these unstable fractures. This was in line with several works in the literature [6], [11], [15], [19], [34]. However, in our series, we did not find this association.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was explained by the difficulty of reducing these unstable fractures. This was in line with several works in the literature [6], [11], [15], [19], [34]. However, in our series, we did not find this association.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The association between age and mechanical complications was not found in the majority of studies in the literature [6], [15]. This was also the case in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For implant selection, more surgeons now prefer the use of intramedullary nails [ 25 – 27 ]. For the position of the helical blade in the femoral head, the TAD, Cal-TAD, and Parker ratios provide good guidance and are practiced in daily work [ 3 , 28 30 ]. For the quality of fracture reduction, there has been a recent tendency for surgeons to pay more attention to the anteromedial cortex rather than to the posteromedial lesser trochanter, as has been previously described [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, trochanteric hip fractures (AO/OTA 31A) are primarily treated using cephalomedullary nails [ 1 3 ]. However, postoperative complications and mechanical failures are frequent, ranging from 3 to 22%[ 4 6 ], with complications including over collapse of the head–neck fragment with femoral neck shortening or varus, helical blade/lag screw lateral back-out, cut-out from the superior femoral head, cut-in through the central femoral head, fracture non-union, and implant nail breakage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%