2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Assessment of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Using 3-Dimensional Surface Tracking for Irradiation of Left-Sided Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method delays the treatment start date, doubles high-dose CT exposure, and requires two plans (CT FB and CT DIBH ) to be generated, which results in more demand on resources. This is in agreement with a study by Tanguturi et al [32] that identified a relationship between greater inspiratory lung volumes and larger dose reductions to cardiopulmonary structures when treating with the DIBH technique. Tanguturi et al [32] suggested that all patients should be scanned in both DIBH and FB, as not every patient will experience a benefit from DIBH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method delays the treatment start date, doubles high-dose CT exposure, and requires two plans (CT FB and CT DIBH ) to be generated, which results in more demand on resources. This is in agreement with a study by Tanguturi et al [32] that identified a relationship between greater inspiratory lung volumes and larger dose reductions to cardiopulmonary structures when treating with the DIBH technique. Tanguturi et al [32] suggested that all patients should be scanned in both DIBH and FB, as not every patient will experience a benefit from DIBH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in agreement with a study by Tanguturi et al [32] that identified a relationship between greater inspiratory lung volumes and larger dose reductions to cardiopulmonary structures when treating with the DIBH technique. Tanguturi et al [32] suggested that all patients should be scanned in both DIBH and FB, as not every patient will experience a benefit from DIBH. Their multivariate analysis concluded that younger age, higher BMI and larger difference in inspiratory volume was associated with a greater reduction in D mean of the heart using DIBH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although this technique was time consuming, needed patient cooperation and technical expertise it clearly reduced the doses to the heart and left lung. Similar findings have been reported in literature [20,42,47].…”
Section: Technical Problemssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…stage, smoking status, co-morbidities and radiation prescription. DIBH technique-specific factors investigated in previous studies as potential factors associated with reduction in heart and lung dose were also collected, 6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and are provided in Table 2. Multiple heart, lung and LAD doses were recorded from both the FB and DIBH plans ( Table 2).…”
Section: Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various potential patient and radiation therapy technique-specific factors have been investigated as potential predictors of mean heart dose reduction. 6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] While these studies have all compared heart doses on free breathing (FB) versus DIBH planning computed tomography (CT) scans of left-sided breast cancer patients receiving radiation therapy to their whole breast or chest wall, predictive factors identified have varied. The aim of this study was to investigate if any factors existed that could identify breast cancer patients who may benefit most from DIBH, to develop a cardiac dose risk profile approach to facilitate appropriate utilisation of departmental resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%