2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2013.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective assessment of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of recurrent ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are generally in matching with earlier studies [7,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] which had patient-based specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 85-100%, 86-100%, and 85-100%, respectively, while at the region level, the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 41-78% and 75-99% and accuracy 72-96%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are generally in matching with earlier studies [7,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] which had patient-based specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 85-100%, 86-100%, and 85-100%, respectively, while at the region level, the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 41-78% and 75-99% and accuracy 72-96%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Ovarian cancer is the second most frequent gynecologic malignancy (preceded by cervix carcinoma) with up to 25 and 75 % chance of 2 years' recurrence of early and advance stages respectively. Thus, the early recurrence detection is crucial for planning of the treatment roadmap aiming to have a better life quality with longer period of disease-free condition [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[34] Negative PET/CT scan findings also have negative predictive value of 90% for detection of recurrence; patients with negative scans were associated with progression-free survival in approximately 2-year follow-up. [39]…”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%